THE BOOK

ISAIAH’S THEOLOGY.

It is in his theology that Isaiah leans most heavily on Israelite tradition and shows an acquaintance with the thoughts of Amos. Isaiah shared with him and with the people the long-standing tradition that a special bond united Israel and its God. Since patriarchal times there had been an agreement, a solemn “Covenant” between them: Israel was to be God’s people and he their God. He had chosen them and cared for them. His solicitude for their welfare had been clearly established. Such was the traditional message. Isaiah knew and honoured this ancient tradition; but, more significantly, he also shared the conviction of Amos that this arrangement was wholly conditional, contingent on the people’s conduct. Behaviour such as Amos saw about him in Samaria and Isaiah saw about him in Jerusalem could cancel that Covenant – had in fact done so; that is the meaning of the vineyard parable in the fifth chapter of Isaiah. There God is compared to the careful and industrious cultivator of a vineyard – Israel – who, angry at the “wild grapes” of injustice and violence that is his crop, threatens to take away his care and protection.

As Isaiah knew him, Israel’s God did not fit into the picture of utter injustice and consequent misery rampant in 8^th century Israel. To that people’s God, as Isaiah knew him, persons mattered. God was, in fact, more concerned about people than about how his subjects performed for him their oft-rehearsed rituals. A literal interpretation of the 13^th verse of chapter 29 and verses 10 to 15 of chapter 1 would suggest that God finds the motions of worship repugnant, and this may well have been Isaiah’s meaning. He was overawed by the holiness – the otherness – of his God and must have thought that the customary gifts of meat, grain and flattery were unseemly or, at the least, irrelevant. Although, like Amos, Isaiah appears most often to speak in absolutes, it is indeed possible to interpret these two passages less strictly (as some scholars do) and to say that he spoke in relative terms and that, in his scale of religious values, he merely ranked moral conduct above ritual conformity.

Isaiah’s theology included the sometimes-comforting view that God shapes history, traditionally entering the human scene to rescue his people from national peril. But, according to Isaiah’s discomforting surmise, God could intervene quite as properly to chastise his own aberrant nation, and he could employ a human agent (e.g., a conquering foe) to that end. More readily than Amos, perhaps because a decade had passed, Isaiah could identify the agent: Assyria. Isaiah’s call to prophecy roughly coincides with the beginning – after a period of relative inactivity – of the westward expansion of the Assyrian empire under the victorious generalship of Tiglath-pileser III (reigned 745-727 BC). Current events did not escape the prophet’s attention. Isaiah appears to have read the omens, as Amos had done; he could clearly see in Assyria the instrument of God’s wrath:

“Ah, Assyria, the rod of my anger, the staff of my fury! Against a godless nation I send him...” (10:5-6).’

So hear the LORD’S sentence, you Judges of Sodom, -----
Attend to GOD’S laws, you Gomorrahn race!
“What to ME,” asks the LORD, is the wealth of your offerings, ----
I am sick of burnt Rams and the fat of fed beasts, ----
Blood of Bulls and of Lambs, and of Goats pleases not. ----
When you come to My Presence who asks them from you.
When trampling My courts?
“Bring no more vain offerings; your incense I hate it, ----
Your Monthly-feasts, and Sabbaths, and solemn assemblies,
Abandon as useless, for I accept not.
My soul hates your Monthly and Festival meetings;
A load they are on Me, ---- I stagger to carry; ----
When you there spread your hands, I turn My face from you,
Though you multiply praying I never will listen,
For blood fills your hands.

“Therefore wash yourselves clean, turn your sins from before you;
Cease your practice of evil when close to My sight.”

(Book 1. Ode 1. 10:16. Fenton Bible.)