THE BOOK
TWO SONS SUMMARY
You who are reading this Work at this point: It must surely be self-evident that, in terms of Bible Scripture; for The One Who came from The Truth (Jesus) to seriously stress the point about Another Who would also come from out of The Truth and Whom He would send at the “end of Days”, cannot possibly be one and the same person. That makes absolutely no sense except in impossible religious interpretation just to suit earthly religious dogma. So, if it is not possible for there to be just One if He speaks of Another to Come, then it simply cannot be Jesus “Who will fulfil that prophecy”. Why can global Christendom not understand that a “personal pronoun” regarding “Another Who is to Come” is exactly that, a personal pronoun proclaiming The Other?
Despite Isaiah’s clear prophecy, Matthew’s unfortunate but appalling blunder of monumental proportions of that prophecy has now perversely become a sacrosanct Christian religious truth, i.e., “Jesus is the Emmanuel who was to Come”. What does simple entry-level mathematics say?
It says that 1 Son + 1 Son = 2 Sons.
Is that, or is that not, clear and plain logic --- and do you, or do you not --- “get that”?
Reader: We sincerely hope that you agree with what you read here, for that will hold you in good stead and may, in the end, be sufficient to protect you from what must come upon the greater part of global humanity who will never believe. The religions certainly will not, for it means an admission of error so great that it would shake the very foundations of global Christendom for one, along with Islam and Judaism. That is the stumbling block, the millstone around the necks of the movers and shakers within the churches, within the religions --– the inability to say: We were wrong! We are wrong!
One Son + One Son equalling Two Sons should presuppose that there must logically be Two separate Names and Two separate Titles. And, of course, that is exactly what we find in the “Face-book” of Christianity -- the Bible. However, what we have not yet revealed is where The Other resides in Creation. That we discover in the next Discourse.
So, to recap: Across the current breadth of just the religions of monotheism, the conceptual-reality of Two Sons of God would surely be condemned outright as anathema to the great bulk of global humanity that holds to monotheism, and certainly to all “right-thinking” Christians: Right? For surely, the present level of Bible interpretation simply cannot be wrong, because everyone thinks the same –- that there is only one Son of God -– and billions cannot possibly be wrong, can they? Right? Sorry; but you are wrong! What do you think, reader?
For the global Islamic community, the very idea of the “Sonship of God” with regard to just Jesus alone is condemnation in the Koran, with even vitriol from some Koranic scholars. If One Son produces that reaction, Two Sons for Muslims would be a step into some form of darkness; an evil notion that could only be written by the worst kind of “unbeliever”.
Moreover, the initial place of revelation of The Two Sons starts in the Bible, a condemned and deceitful book according to Islam –- a book that only unbelievers would believe in. However, whilst the revelation of Two Sons of God can be read in just one single defining Scripture in The Revelation of the Bible (we will itemise more in a later Discourse), the final detailed picture about The Two paradoxically ends in The All-Truth --- now on earth!
What would the “Chosen” ones, the Jews, say about Two Sons of God? It’s not in the Torah; so, for Judaism, at the very least derision or similar, but certainly dismissed as impossible. Because the Torah and the Talmud do not subscribe to such a notion, and the scholars of the long religious history of Jewry evidently do not refer to any such idea in all their revered scrolls, how then for Israel can such a thing possibly be? It’s not in God’s plan for the “Chosen”, they would say, or some such similar but very wrong argument.
Yet the “Great Prophet” says it, and he was ‘Called by God” to long- prepare the Jewish people and the rest of the world to be ready for exactly this reality, for it was truly so according to The Will of God. Of course, to fully understand why the ancient Book of Isaiah connects so crucially to this present Era, we really must know The Final Law as given in the Very All-Truth.
That, however, is the “paradoxical and enigmatic quandary” in this whole scenario.
For, ordinarily, unless we have recognised the super-critical reality of the entry of The All-Truth onto the earth, how can we possibly know that such Laws of Creation in their absolute finality actually exist? Well, we can, but not through the doctrines and dogma of religion; they are all too rigidly “locked-in- stone”. But we can know through “spiritual seeking” that is basically the same as Einstein’s ‘intuition’ and ‘revelation’. Only in that way can we be free of the shackles of religion. We opine that for most “humans” this is really just another “carousel”.
No recognition of the All-Truth: No concomitant recognition of The Laws of Creation of God: No knowledge of the deeper recognitions of religious Scripture, Verse and Text: No final knowledge of Who and What the “Spirit of Truth” really is: No knowledge of his True Title and place in Creation: No recognition of His birth, life and His All-Truth legacy that He brought to earth.
Since that reality is already known by the “few” on earth who gratefully recognised and believed, and because such a glorious Act of Grace can have no affinity with fractured and intransigent earthly religions; we reveal -- for you --- this stupendous happening as prophesied and explained only by Isaiah [albeit in cryptic visionary terms], right here in this Discourse.
The All-Truth, from where we draw our “deeper” revelations, provides the knowledge of encryption of all Scripture. For the Power of its very entry onto the earth through “Its Bringer” has long-begun the process of unmasking, stripping away and laying bare, all “falsehood” on earth; hence the increasing levels of violence in all global societies. We foolish humans are “taking ourselves out”. As we will repeat; the nightly newscasts say it all.
We digressed, interestingly and necessarily, but now, in the context of this Discourse, we will once more examine Jewish beliefs and specifically Jerusalem. In the previous Discourse; sub: “Battleground Jerusalem”, we very briefly looked at the notion that Jerusalem will be the “House of The Lord” at the ostensible appearance of the “Promised Messiah”. Promulgated by global Christendom and Judaism in the first instance, the problem of an “Enthroned Messiah” in Jerusalem -- for that must surely be the hope of the ‘faithful’ -- is: ‘Whose Messiah will He be’?
Or, more precisely in the light of His actual entry onto the earth: ‘Whose Messiah should He have been? Of course, it is a silly question. As we have previously stated: He cannot possibly be denominational, and certainly not religious. The few excerpts thus far that we have quoted from His All-Truth clearly reveal that fact. His Place of Abode on earth -- where He put into written form the Living Truth inherent in Him -- was in a geographical region of the world that was “mountainous”, exactly as many Biblical Scriptures of prophecy about His Coming clearly describe. It was not Jerusalem, so no connection whatsoever with the city of “three religions”!