THE BOOK

Back Next

THE TWO SONS OF GOD

“Grace to you and peace, from Him who is, and who was and who is to come; and from the seven Spirits who are before His throne; and from Jesus Christ,...” (New American Standard Bible.)

“Blessing and peace to you from the One Who Is, Who Was and Who comes; and from the seven Spirits which are before His throne; and from Jesus Christ.” (Revelation. 1:4-5, Fenton. Emphases mine.)

That one Scripture, perhaps more than any other in the entire Bible and all religious writings, possesses the “Golden Key” to the clear reality of The Two Sons of God! It needs only to be read with an open spirit and without “religious fear” for the profound Truth of it to be intuitively recognised.

Reader: As we stated at the outset, the many inclusions in this Work are sourced from whichever publications we can find that best meet with the Title designation, and subject matter. For the Title, by itself, tells the story of our long religious journey to the present. In addition, insofar as the “big three” of monotheistic thinking are concerned, the ancillary addenda to the main Title heading points to the dross, misinterpretation, and distortions of Divine Truths that they have all dragged along to the present.

Tragically, though they would never be convinced of it, down with them into their “well of untruth”, they have taken around half of the world’s population with them. For the “few”, then; let us now teach the Truth of:

The TWO SONS OF GOD! Clearly to monotheism, blasphemous. Should we designate it a statement, or a question? Standard Christian beliefs generally accept an approaching end time of great tribulation and destruction and the concomitant need for there to be the return of Jesus to earth to, ostensibly, fulfil the revelatory prophecies from Biblical Scripture. Even Time magazine, Issue 1 July 2002; devoted their lead story to this long-held belief; a belief that will become serious and catastrophic reality for global humanity and especially Christianity --- for the “expected return” of Jesus to save them cannot possibly occur. We have already explained why and will do so more than once or twice as we continue!

This Section is primarily derived from the Bible, for the analyses of M.M. Ali from Koranic verse, and similarly from Jewish scholars and their Torah, as we discovered offer very little in terms of true enlightenment on our present subject. That is why, in terms of the face-books of the three monotheistic religions, the Bible “rules”!

Now: If we broadly trace the line of Religious Prophets and “Truth-Bringers” and the teachings they brought to earth at their particular time in history -– Lao- Tse, Zoroaster, Buddha and Mohammed, Moses and the Prophets etc., -– we find revealed therein a spiritual/evolutionary continuum that leads to a particular level of knowledge and insight. Though gifted with exceptional spiritual insight and guided strongly in their tasks, what they could not give was the greater encompassing knowledge of the wider Creation. For it is not possible for any human being to inherently know that level of knowledge.

Thus it was that Jesus, The Son of God, brought a more complete knowledge of The Truth than had yet been given to mankind up to that point. In fact, He brought the whole of The Truth, but humankind were too spiritually closed to fully recognise His Sacred Mission. Even those closest to Him, those who received more instruction than any others -- His Disciples; even they were not sufficiently spiritually-matured to understand all that He could have given them. Aware that the ruling Jewish Religious Authority actively sought His death and that the time He would need to fully instruct the Disciples on the complete knowledge of The Truth would be short, He began to speak of the time in the future when that would occur.

So, the time-line of the great Prophets and Truth-Bringers associated with the incarnation of Jesus onto the earth plane reveal an almost evolutionary spiritual-knowledge path of Truth up to the present. And that is correct in its basic outline. The premise that this Work postulates absolutely unequivocally, therefore, is that Jesus stands at the apex of Truth, since He Himself is a Living Part of It. And He, as the Part thereof designated as not only The Word but also “The Love of God”, thus forever stands as:

ONE OF THE TWO SONS OF GOD!

If we did not state that reality as a living conviction in these pages, this Discourse would, of itself, be blasphemous. And would thereby serve to corrupt and distort the truth of:

THE LIVING WORD OF GOD!

That we will not do since the purpose of this Work is to offer signposts to the whole of The Truth. The danger of denying that which is of The Living Truth Itself lies in the outworking of The Divine Laws of Creation on those who so deny. That outworking rests completely and lawfully in The Law: “What a man sows, that shall he reap.” Since there actually are Two Sons of God, a denial of this fact will ultimately bring the “severe reaping” on whomsoever so denies, to individuals, to religions, to whole peoples.

REVELATION OF THE OTHER SON

As background to our bold claim and in a very compressed journey in time, we need to look at the path and impact of Judaeo-Christian beliefs on both the civilised and the New Worlds long after the time of Christ. The rise and fall of the many civilisations of the “Ancient World”, particularly those written about in the Old Testament, ultimately prepared the stage for the Message of Jesus to begin its journey out into the world. Initially, of course, across and out to the borders of the Roman Empire, but thence to its future dissemination to the wider world through the later European Empires. The general religious foundation of the latter is basically derived from the Judaeo-Christian ethos as outlined in the Bible. However, its entry into the European psyche to the present time saw it undergo many upheavals resulting in huge differences in meaning from the original simple and pure Teaching of Its Bringer, Jesus.

The religious authorities were not content to simply accept the clear Truth He brought but chose, instead, to erect huge monasteries and “schools of learning”, behind which doors they could dissect His original Teachings. As a result of this long process of analysis and debate, the once-clear meanings underwent change, some subtle, some far more radical. What finally emerged from that fermenting crucible of intellectual religiosity differs vastly from the Spiritual original given by Jesus. Not only that, but for a time was also removed from the ordinary people. Thus, what little the masses were permitted to have, even that was used to enforce and maintain religious power over them by the few; the few in “the Church” (of Catholicism) who wielded absolute power --- the power of life and death.

The sorry history of mankind testifies to the fact that through very especial “Called Ones”, Divine Will many times strove to seed the great Truths in men. Men, however, unfortunately, and perversely, subverted them all to become just religions and/or splintered offshoots of. For the most part, therefore, the “many religions” became just institutions of earthly power, wealth, and religious subjugation.

This dark volition can be readily traced through the mad, religious fervour of the Dark Ages and the later, equally insane, Inquisition! The wealth and excesses of the Papacy seeded the wonderfully enlightened protestations of the great spiritual scholar Martin Luther who, in 1520, launched the Protestant Reformation. His opposition to the, then, entrenched religious view found a kindred soul in the English King, Henry VIII. By the Act of Supremacy in 1536, Henry effectively formed a new English Church and broke with Rome.

Later, via exploration and colonisation, the gradual expansion and consolidation of the European Maritime Nations to the New Worlds occurred. Thus, along with the export of European ideas and some of their criminals, went the zealous missionaries and their Christian religion in its more or less final, distilled form.

Whilst that was obviously an expansion of the European Empires, it was not at the same time an expansion of Spiritual Truth. What was exported to the new lands was far less spiritual than the original pure Teaching. The religious madness of the Inquisition ensured that certain ideas of religious rigidity, formulated as nothing more than just ‘dogma’ during those long centuries of bigotry and cruel torture, were henceforth retained as inviolable tenets of the new religious thinking. That is what arrived in the New World to challenge and then, for the most part, subjugate the peoples to whom it was usually forcibly introduced.

However, even though the “religion” had lost much of the essence of actual Spiritual Truth it was at least, in many ways, more enlightened than anything some of the Indigenous peoples of the New World possessed. Thus, in accordance with their “divine mandate” as they believed it to be -- and paradoxically probably should have been -- European explorers and Missionaries carried their version of The Word, once delivered Spiritually-pristine from out of the mouth of Its Bringer, to many parts of the Earth.

What arrived in those far-off lands was therefore not truly a correct interpretation of the Teachings of Jesus as recorded in the Bible. Religious scholars in great Universities and Theological Colleges today still argue and debate many points of religious disputation. Uncertain theoretical or theological argument should have no place in the dissemination of “The Living Word” given to humankind from One Whose Origin hailed from the very Source of that Word Itself! For any such wrong interpretation must logically be a dangerous transgression against the very Creation-Laws of God.

A radical statement concerning Two Sons of God, then, would surely be described as too blasphemous to even consider, given that no past or present- day clergy or religious authority has publicly mooted this “possibility”. Yet, such radical assertions cannot be made without some relevant form of Biblical or Scriptural foundation to begin with. For that is the standard measure by which to anchor such a premise, at least in the world of Christian religion. That we have certainly done in this Discourse thus far.

Yet despite the clearly contentious nature of what we are saying, we nevertheless urge well-meaning Christians and Biblical scholars to be sufficiently open-minded to examine this matter at least objectively. We categorically state, however, that we do not, in any shape or form, seek approbation or approval from any said religious or Christian Authority or Church anywhere to state what we assert herein. For, in reality, the debates that still rage among the “religious learned” are simply the final end-excrescence of that process begun so many centuries ago, even pre-dating the Church-theology of Medieval Europe.

The relative times differ vastly of course in that today we possess far greater scientific knowledge about much more of the world. The terrible period of the Dark Ages to the Reformation when ‘the Church’ held absolute power, was finally broken when the Age of Enlightenment literally burst upon European Catholicism.

Probably in most countries today, a non-partisan Police Force and Judiciary protect citizens who might wish to challenge the religious status-quo. To have asserted then what we assert here now would surely have resulted in charges of heresy and blasphemy, and thus a death sentence -- one invariably preceded by cruel torture to try to force a recant.

Yet, has anything really changed? Today it is not Christianity that seeks to force “unbelievers” to “believe”, but Islam. Utilising the modern dimension of social media to shock with real-time viewing of beheadings etc., it is obvious that Islam has not learned from the many examples in human history; that it is actually alien for human beings to accept any form of religious coercion or slavery for any length of time. They inevitably rebel against their “enslavers”, and usually with great bloodshed. That’s the way it is!

So, it really doesn’t matter how often well-meaning apologists and obviously more intelligent Muslims might aver that Islam is a “religion of peace”, the ongoing and increasing incidents of what is just plain “cowardly butchery” by extremist Jihadists speaks for itself. That is the global perception.

It is said that over any given thing, “perception” possesses more power than the “reality” of the same. With “modern Islam”, however, “perception” is now more the actual reality.

As with most questions, however -- as we must state often -- either a given thing is so, or it is not. Particular historical times and events can never alter that clear truth. So is it with our radical assertion that marks the reason for this current Discourse! Either there are Two Sons of God, as we unequivocally state, or there is only One: Jesus, for Christians --- or, for Islam and Judaism, none at all. For the purposes of this exercise: If, as we proclaim, there are Two, then that clearly poses huge and fundamental questions for the “big three” of monotheism –- and not least for the time that is referred to as “The Final Tribulation”.

Let us therefore once more consult the Bible and the key Scriptures within that clearly reveal and validate the Truth about “The Two Sons of God”. And from that Truth in Biblical Scripture exactly around this crucial recognition, let us intuitively strive to understand the monumental portent and far-reaching ramifications of this reality.

The starting point of the Bible is, of course, The Book of Genesis. The general Christian belief about it all would probably aver that Genesis seemingly states that in the beginning there was only GOD. Thus, a One God Who has existed from Eternity, and the darkness of a formless void, nothing else. No life except that of The Creator. Further to that ‘belief’, therefore, it would probably be fair to say that most adherents of the “big three” religions believe that God Himself ‘created the world and all in it’. The Torah certainly states so.

Yet John, the beloved of Jesus, makes a fundamentally more profound statement in the very first Verse of his Book. We know from New Testament Scripture that John and the other Disciples -- who all lived literally cheek-by-jowl with Jesus -- were given the greatest amount of knowledge that men had yet received about Creation, life and The Law. Since their Teacher was The Son of God Himself, we should surely expect that certain passages written by at least some of the Disciples might just carry within them far-reaching insights of tremendous spiritual import for all of humankind. However, for the world of Christianity and monotheism in general, in this case they seed crucial truths of a “spiritually-explosive” nature. Thus, we read in John, the beloved of Jesus, Chapter 1, Verses 1-3:

If we now analyse those passages with an open, objective, and questing spirit and mind, we immediately see that at the time when Creation came into being there was not just GOD and the empty void, as Genesis might ‘appear’ to indicate, or incorrect bible interpretation preaches. There was Another -- with GOD! The obvious question automatically deriving from that crucial point must logically be: Who was “He Who was present with GOD...”? Was ‘He’ Jesus, as might perhaps be accepted by Christianity? Or was ‘He’ the Other, Whom we have already Named?

The key insight that must be grasped here is that Whomever it was that John referred to, was present with GOD ‘at the beginning of Creation’. Moreover, the use of the personal pronoun He is a clear pointer as to Who this particular One actually is. As a second vital pointer to the answer, the Scripture also clearly states that; “...the Word that was with GOD...” was the “...He Who was present ‘at the beginning’.” And that; “...all came into existence by means of Him!” To reiterate the key point of that particular Scripture once more:

He Who was with GOD was also the Word of GOD too, and that all came into existence by means of Him! Such a simple statement is surely clear enough to understand, for there is no mystery here. As we have previously and seriously stressed, the Bible identifies Who that “Other” actually Is. The knowledge of Who He is thus elucidates and clarifies many points of religious contention.

Now to further strengthen our premise that He “Who was with God at the beginning” was the same He Who created “all things”, all we need do is go to Verse 2 of Chapter 1 in Genesis. For the purpose of comparison and evaluation, we will quote from three different Bibles:

The unequivocal reference to a ‘Creative Spirit’ in three different Bibles clearly shows that it was not God Himself Who Created the “heavens and the earth”, but He Who was with Him! The very fact that it is so written reveals that the ancient writers of the original texts understood this clearly.

Of course, we should readily understand that Creation itself nevertheless proceeded only according to GOD’s Plan, under His Power and Authority, but through He Who was with GOD as a Part of Him.

A note of caution should be sounded here. We should not attempt to interpret the complete Creation-process as involving just the earth and its immediate, material interstellar environs. A clearly stupendous happening of colossal and humanly-incomprehensible magnitude would thereby be brought down to a superficial level of human-earthly non-understanding. Fenton’s sub- heading provides the vital spiritual insight:

“The First Creation of the Universe by God ...”

For the word “earth” does not refer solely to our earthly home but is symbolic of a far larger “Spiritual” Reality.

The same basic reference to that Other With God can be found in both our main Bibles of reference and, indeed, in virtually all the different Bibles. So the same Scripture of John 1:1-3 in the King James Version reads:

The Jerusalem Bible (1985 edition) states it similarly:

In order to completely clarify this issue, we should very carefully note that whilst He of The Word was with GOD, both He and The Word --- as an inseparable Part of GOD --- was thus also GOD.

Yet whilst He is The Word, and The Word is GOD, there is nevertheless a clear demarcation in the ‘Divine Working’ between He Who --- as the Creative Will of GOD --- brought all things into being through The Word; -- and GOD -- out of Whom He of The Word came.

Surely that is simple enough to understand, because --- for Christians especially --- this really isn’t “rocket science”!

If we now track to certain other Bible passages where Jesus is similarly referred to as The Word, then apparent discrepancies do appear to develop.

(Reader: Full clarification of this critical reality –- as given by Jesus to His Disciples -- may be found in the following sections: The Disciple’s Confusion, “He” Who is “Enthroned”, and further illumination from The Revelation.)

In this segment, however, from our two main reference Bibles, we will simply quote two Scriptures that have, for just over 2 billion human souls, very unfortunately set-in-concrete the terribly erroneous belief of just One Son. From John 1:14, Fenton:

Notwithstanding the seemingly ironclad meaning here, the word begotten in these Scriptures actually offers a pointer to the Truth of it all. For, in this case, The One who was begotten should not be regarded as The One who was present from the beginning -– of Creation.

Begotten: Past participle of beget; -- ‘to cause to exist’.

The Scripture therefore stands spiritually-correct. Jesus was the only begotten Son after The Creation, for it was not He -- as The Love of GOD -- that was or is The Creative Will of GOD.

He, as The Love, however, was also The Word too. Thus: He was that Part of The Word of GOD that had to incarnate on earth 2,000 years ago, if humankind were not to fall utterly and irretrievably. -- WHY? ----

As far back as the eighth century B.C., the prophet Isaiah foresaw the path that we of Planet Earth would take. The present-day state of it and its global societies clearly shows a calamitous and rapidly-deteriorating situation. We have looked at this key prophecy a number of times thus far, but it certainly won’t hurt to lay it on global humanity again.

In the Book of Isaiah, that prophecy ostensibly foretells the “Desolation of Judea”, which probably did take place. However, as we have shown, a far wider view of Isaiah’s prophecies must be taken for it resonates directly with the outcome for the earth and its peoples with the arrival of Imanuel on earth. In this rendition we will use Fenton’s Bible which features his re-discovery of the “Hebrew cadence of verse” prevalent in Isaiah’s time.

So, because of the wrong and dark direction that the “chosen” people had voluntary committed to, it was therefore necessary for there to be the entry onto earth of One stronger than the prophets who preceded Him. They, for thousands of years, had continually warned the so-called ‘chosen race’ to heed The Law; but the ‘stiff-necked people’ would not.

Thus, Jesus came to them in the first instance, but ultimately for all humanity. For only He at that time could explain The Law — CREATION-LAW — and thereby show the way back to The Truth, because the knowledge He bore was Complete and Living within Him. As previously stated: Aware that the ruling Jewish Religious Authority sought His death, Jesus realised two crucial things:

From then on He began to speak of the time in the future when that complete knowledge for the earth and its peoples would one day arrive. He thus began to speak of The Other Son Who would bring to earth the ALL-TRUTH.

In an Act of Love totally incomprehensible to us of Planet Earth, the begetting of Jesus by The Creator from out of Himself stayed the complete and utter fall of humankind. Through that process -- and in a time-continuum that we human beings cannot hope to ever even begin to understand -- may be seen the sequence of the step-by-step establishment of The GODHEAD for the Creations.

Reader: we are going to jump ahead a little here into the Creation process; really the preserve of a later Discourse. However, in attempting to explain the above sequence of the crucial-for-humanity “emergence” of The Two Sons of God; quite obviously what you have just read is not my knowledge, for no human being could ever know, let alone understand, such things. Despite the great difficulty of the explanatory task here, we are not seeking to try to understand what is humanly-incomprehensible; rather, we are attempting to offer a broad sweep of the “mechanics” of the process --- almost like a diagrammatical representation.

Even though we will never really succeed in doing so --- for human beings cannot possibly give it the Gravitas of Divine Power that it inherently encompasses --- we have nonetheless been gifted with that knowledge from The Hand of the “Spirit of Truth” Himself.

To that end, let’s read from His Living Word on this crucially-vital subject. Taken from a Lecture in His Legacy to us, the following excerpts will help the truly genuine and humble seeker.

Reader, in ordinary times the level of knowledge that this Lecture offers would not be given to just anybody, for most would mock Truth anyway. However, as is plain for every one of us on earth in the latter half of 2021, these are no longer ordinary times.

Politicians of all persuasions are now powerless to stop what is unfolding more and more alarmingly. We all know we are in real trouble. That is why the depth of knowledge that this Lecture The Son of Man offers humankind is included here.

Desperate times can only be understood under the aegis of Divine Truth!

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

IMANUEL:
THE “SPIRIT OF TRUTH”

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Reader, the nuances of Imanuel’s writing here give us all very important clues about the “separating-out process” whereby He came into Being as The Will of God from out of God, and Jesus later as The Love of God! E.g.: “Both being Parts of the Father are One with Him, and the Father is within Them. From eternity unto all eternity!”

There are no wives or consorts required here to produce His Sons! Islam: That is such a narrow earthly-religious “teaching” that it is really very difficult to understand how it could ever arise. Letting go the brain-washing aspect of the Muslim religion; the genesis of that Islamic belief simply cannot be reconciled with just simple, everyday logic.

With regard to that appallingly-distorted Muslim dogma; from a very interesting publication that crossed my path, this clearly perceptive observation from a “Christian” lecturer in astronomy seems to evince both surprise and relief at this crucial, and no doubt, life-changing recognition:

“I’ve always believed we’ve tried to make God too small!”

In a most interesting paradox; for global Christendom in the first instance, the other two of monotheism, Islam, and Judaism, but ultimately for all religions and belief-systems and even science in the second; the key to so many ‘problem-questions’ ultimately centres on the knowledge of, and about, The Two Sons.

Unfortunately, however, the ‘default setting’ of global Christendom to any notion that clashes with the ‘official doctrine’ of One Son only is so locked in stone that even the most catastrophic events will probably not be sufficient for this most necessary awakening. Fear of change on the one hand, and absolute certainty of their One Son only interpretation on the other, will ensure –-- for the majority of Christians at least --- that Isaiah’s clear prophecy of “few men left” will come to pass.

Now, what of this other “SON of GOD” Whom we Proclaim? We well-know that the Christian Churches –- who should know “their Bible” -– have always spoken of only One Son of God, Jesus! And that He, as The Living Word also, therefore brought the complete and final Truth to mankind. He, as a Part of The Living Truth Itself, certainly brought “the whole”, living, within Him.

Let’s again reinforce the reason why Imanuel had to come to earth. Due to humankind’s spiritual immaturity at the time, the inability of the people to receive The Truth fully from Jesus meant that the writings of those who were closest to Him -- His Disciples -– are incomplete with regard to the whole that Jesus brought to earth at that time. The obvious ramification that such an assertion must logically presume is that the Bible, therefore, does not contain the whole.

The Apostle Paul provides the relevant insight in his ‘Letter to the Corinthians’. We should carefully note that the words of Paul were written after the Crucifixion, and after the Outpouring which, according to some religious “scholars”, was the watershed event that would lead them (the Disciples) into “all-Truth”! Thus, the time when Jesus would send The Holy Spirit.

The Church thus broadly accepts the Outpouring of The Holy Spirit at Pentecost as the fulfilment of a key prophecy of Jesus i.e., “...to send the Helper, the Comforter, The Spirit of Truth after His departure”. Jesus is recorded as stating, however, that The Holy Spirit “...will reprove the world of sin”. The word, ‘reprove’, clearly means to reprimand, to admonish, to reproach. The Outpouring of The Holy Spirit then, did not result in that event.

Two thousand years later, however; it is now a very different story, for we have all “arrived” at the precise point in our evolutionary journey where the world --- our global societies, our religions, our “chosen” way of life and being --- is actually being “reproved of sin” in real time! We can all surely see that that process is already happening, and that there is a clear acceleration of more and more devastating events.

Thus, the admonition of Jesus therefore unequivocally refers to that which this specific Discourse addresses. It refers to the Coming of The Son of Man Who is also The Spirit of Truth/The Holy Spirit.

Against this fact, some may cite the words of Matthew 12:32. (New American Standard Bible.): “Anyone who speaks a word against The Son of man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against The Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or the age to come.”

The contention may thus arise that, as per the above, Jesus seemingly differentiates between The Son of Man and The Holy Spirit. Clearly, there are different ways of interpreting that Scripture. One could say that even if The Son of Man and The Holy Spirit are one and the same Person, speaking a single word against Him may be forgiven, but continually speaking against The Holy Spirit will not result in forgiveness. This clarifying interpretation becomes more plausible when one considers a different translation of the same Scripture from Fenton. (Underline mine):

Fenton’s illuminating translation presupposes an interesting but nonetheless spiritually-dangerous quandary for Islam. In the first place, we know that the Muslim world would never ever speak insultingly of their ‘Holy Spirit’, simply because he is stated to be Muhammad. However, that “Islamic reality” is only valid IF that really were the case. If not --- and that is the great Muslim danger --- then condemnation of the actual Spirit of Truth --- which may be read in many, many places in the Koran --- will simply not be permitted to continue past the point of the long-prophesied and ordained “destruction” of all that refuses to conform to, and obey, The Divine Laws of Creation, including the religion of Islam and all its followers.

Such a destructive event, though a tragedy of monumental proportions, along with similar destruction of other religions, will, however, simply fulfil the great warning prophecies of there being: “FEW MEN LEFT!”

So, the clear difference between the phrase “gives expression to a thought” versus “shall speak insultingly” means that you, reader, must spiritually-perceive and thus enter into the true sense of the words whilst understanding that the designations, Spirit of Truth, Holy Spirit and Son of Man --- whilst seeming to be separate entities --- are nevertheless: One and The Same!

(I wonder how many times we will have to state this incontrovertible Truth before someone out there in “religiosity land” will finally awaken, and “get it”.)

We can perhaps better understand the non-forgiveness aspect of the Scripture which pertains to the title, “The Holy Spirit”, if we relate it to that Part of The Son of Man which is The Holy Spirit as the Creative Spirit -- THE WILL -- of GOD.

Thus. He Who brought all things into being through The Word. We human beings, also brought into being and gifted conscious life by the very same Creative Spirit, should therefore understand the strict requirement to not transgress the Divine Commandment:

“Thou Shalt Not Take The Name Of The Lord Thy God In Vain.”

Thus, in reiteration: He of the Word Who was with GOD is also He Who Is The Word of GOD.

Notwithstanding the obvious Spiritual Power that must have been experienced by those present at “The Outpouring” at Pentecost, Paul states very clearly in Corinthians 13:9-10 KJV:

Fenton translates the same passages thus:

And The Jerusalem Bible says:

Simple logic must lead us to the obvious conclusion that Paul could not have been referring to Jesus Himself as the “part” or the imperfect, for He, Whose Origin was The Divine, was complete in Knowledge and Perfection. In Paul’s entire ministry, nothing to the contrary was ever so stated by him. In addition, and notwithstanding Islam’s implacable opposition to this reality, it would be ludicrous to try to argue that the Teachings of Jesus as The Son (PART) of God could be done away with, become useless, or disappear. Paul certainly knew that, as did the Disciples.

For Matthew, (24:35 Fenton, parenthetic addition mine), records Jesus stating in admonishing warning that:

As previously examined, theologians and Bible scholars could be forgiven for believing that The Outpouring was, after all, the event where The Holy Spirit gave the “complete and perfect”, The All-Truth, to the Disciples. For the strength of the happening was such that they all spoke in tongues and became seeing, yet a simple analysis of it all points to a very different conclusion; a conclusion that Paul understood quite clearly.

Therefore, if Jesus was not “the part” -- and He surely was not the imperfect -- then who or what was Paul referring to? Who, therefore, would bring the Perfect, and when? Now, reader, whilst we have already proclaimed Him, we still need to show you how this worst possible distortion developed and thus discover why, in over two thousand years of supposedly increasing knowledge, there is still no recognition, and therefore no understanding.