SQLSTATE[23000]: Integrity constraint violation: 1062 Duplicate entry '216.73.217.151-2026-08-15 11:44:31-2026-08-15 11:44:31' for key 'PRIMARY'
SOCIAL MEDIA
In 2019, some governments began the legislative process to seriously curb the “too-free” approach that the social media giants of Google, Face-Book and Twitter have thus far allowed themselves. American companies taking advantage of their Constitution with its accursed “rights” to dark, “anything-goes”, free speech attitude once again!
An extension of this is children’s literature. Across the board, it has gone from a level of being educational and amusing to, in many cases, suffering from just empty superficiality. With much of it making little logical sense, there seems to be a concomitant and purposeful trend towards grammatically incorrect ‘prose”. Along with the convenience of texting phonetically, the whole dumbing-down trend teaches children to talk nonsense, and all this in the name of progress? We think not!
Social media has become one of the greatest curses for humanity, with truly gormless “humans” opening the door for other people to peer into their equally gormless “lives”. There is no understanding of the critical need to seek out the “right stuff” for their spirit. Without that vital introspection, there is no real meaningful progress down here in this “school of earthly experiencing”! Women even follow bikini models on Instagram, to the point of engaging in “chat-rooms” over various aspects of both the models and their outfits. How puerile and empty is that?
Social media has thus played a key role in the creation of a whole generation of woman who are totally obsessed with ‘self’. This is globally-evident in the ‘selfie-craze’ where it is more important to ‘look good’ than to ‘DO good’. It is no wonder that there has been a sharp increase in body-conscious women, with associated eating disorders that ostensibly determine the optimal body size and shape, and how toned it needs to be etc.
These things are held in greater esteem than understanding the reason for being here on planet earth! The camera lens of every modern woman’s “mobile accessory” has surely helped to relegate spiritual seeking well into the background, if not smashing it out of ‘focus’ completely. Why? We have just told you; too busy looking into the camera and/or posting mostly superficial personal rubbish onto their equally superficial and garbage Facebook pages.
This quite strange end-outcome today is the result of a process that began thousands of years ago with the great “Fall of Man”! That was when we voluntarily cut ourselves off from what had previously been a strong, natural, and pure “spiritual connection” to our very “origins”. That great and unnecessary “Fall” brought decadent empires and societies in its wake. Our 21st century reality thus establishes itself as being the sum total of that long period of increasingly-aspiritual and dissolute development.
Yes, we are more knowledgeable about more things, and our technological advances are quite mind-blowing. And No: We do not have gladiatorial games where over many weeks thousands of men and animals are slaughtered just to entertain the masses. However, commensurate with the learning and knowledge we did acquire should also have developed the same progress, and more, in “spiritual” insight and understanding.
And that is where we have not just “not kept pace”, but very studiously not even bothered with the most basic understanding of our very purpose on earth: The “SPIRITUAL”! What we very ignorantly settled for was just distorted religions and spiritually-meaningless “social stuff”, so we have actually regressed, even if we think we haven’t.
The great difference today has to be the detrimental effect of the greater numbers of “us” that now inhabit the earth, to the point of threatening its very viability as a stable, self-renewing, dynamic system. Our greater numbers have also “stressed” global societies to a point not ever encountered before.
So, all the stressed-out “human lemmings” now seek relief and release from all our self-imposed pressures through social media, alcohol, drugs, and sexual proclivities. And each in its own insidious and not-so-insidious way has contributed to:
“THE DEATH OF HUMAN SPIRITUAL ENNOBLEMENT”!
Let’s itemise a few more “causal realities”!
THE GLOBAL CURSE OF “DRUGS”
Here we see the dark extent of the influence of the “Lucifer Principle” in the moral decay of too many urban communities in various cities across the world! The U.S., however, possesses perhaps the strangest relationship with drugs.
Its “War on Terror” has resulted in more drugs coming out of Afghanistan than ever did before American intervention --- or interference --- in that country
As we stated very early on; in America’s case, particularly with the import of drugs from Central and South America, an endless parade of Presidents and politicians, congressmen, and senators, have railed, ad-nauseum, against the growers, the suppliers, the drugs Cartels, and anybody else that might contribute to their “national habit”.
But you never ever hear them blame the “good old boys and girls” of America, “land of the free”.
In so many areas, the sheer and blatant hypocrisy of that “nation” simply beggars belief. It as though the whole country is so blinkered with “its patriotism and its flag” that simple and clear logic is lost on the whole lot of them. Nothing else matters but “America’s way”. Well, reader, they are especially “in the gun”! Like the rest of us, their time, too, is long past its “use-by-date”!
America: If you don’t want a drug problem, then have the guts to stand up
and place the blame where it truly lies -----
------ on your weak, simple-minded, and hypocritical populace!
From the much-lauded Office of the President of the United States; to the Senate, the Congress, and the individual State Legislatures; you all sing and dance to the same stupid tune of blaming everybody else whilst bemoaning the now unstoppable conduit of drugs to feed your eager, equally-stupid millions. Your great adopted colossus of science, Einstein, said it perfectly succinctly. His definition of “senility”:
“To keep doing the same things and expect a different result.”
“FAMILY” ENTERTAINMENT OF THE WESTERN WORLD
We have specifically targeted the West, primarily America of course, because of the sheer volume of “entertainment programmes” that spew forth from there to deluge the globe. To best demonstrate that reality, the following Section really “says it all”.
Language in American Culture and “Entertainment”
The development of the entertainment industry, particularly from the movie studios and in the medium of television, has spawned a particular brand of “language-ethos”. Spewing forth from the big screen over the past 100 or so odd years and the small screen for about 70 years, movie and television studios worldwide have produced the spiritually-strange force of ‘entertainment’ --- more especially from Hollywood. Producing great wealth and power for the few, the American “entertainment industry” sways the lives of billions globally.
Under the aegis of the American Constitution, particularly the all-encompassing, all-embracing “Free Speech Amendment”, very few curbs have been placed on what producers and directors can say or show there. And, of course, American entertainment is exported all over the globe. Since the visual aspect is almost invariably accompanied by “the script”; language, by inference, has followed the trend of the visual medium into the more extreme, the crass, and the more debased. Music lyrics have followed a similar trend. What price freedom --- in the ultimate sense? True and genuine freedom must presuppose the requirement to exercise responsibility. Not simply responsibility as espoused and formulated by secular demands and law, but responsibility under the greatest aegis of all --- that of Divine Creation-Law!
Voices raised in protest today against rapidly-falling moral or social standards invariably die away under the too-greater-pressure exerted by the masses seeking more entertainment of more extreme, so-called, entertainment value; aided, quite naturally, by the wealthy power-brokers who produce, supply and control it all.
Especially for you politicians and power-brokers, the following key excerpt is taken from an address by Edward R. Murrow, the famous news presenter and journalist for CBS Corporation. (Reader, the full text should be mandatory reading for, at the very least, all Americans.)
On October 15th, 1958, in a keynote and now definitive speech to the Radio-Television News Directors Association and Foundation (RTNDA), Edward R. Murrow questioned the direction that Radio and Television might take American society. His speech runs to six pages of type so we will regrettably only reproduce a few very pertinent points from a discourse in which every sentence is most pertinent; more especially for that group of citizens who proudly call their Nation “the world’s only true superpower” and, strangely-concomitantly, so-called leader of the free world.
We would therefore recommend that every citizen of America –-- along with almost everyone else since all cultures are strongly impacted, if not entirely subsumed, by American “entertainment” --– read or freely download Murrow’s complete speech from the “Keynote Speech” page on the website dedicated to his life and work at: Edward R. Murrow.
The uplifting power inherent in language for the betterment of society, as he indeed employed it, rings out in that speech. It can now be seen as prophetic, and his clarified intellect permitted him to know that at the time. The high point of the American Nation, industry and people was the Second World War and its immediate aftermath. Forced to reject isolationism after Pearl Harbour, America mobilised its great industrial might and millions of servicemen to fight and help defeat a monstrous evil. Without that monumental effort the world might well have entered a new Dark Age. Post-war America then nobly helped defeated and destroyed enemy to rebuild their war-ravaged countries and economies.
Freedom without spiritual responsibility post-war, however, seeded a sliding away from previously firm and relatively-ennobled values. American “culture” is, today, now riven with spiritually-aberrant ideas and practices --– the so-called Freedoms guaranteed by The Constitution. Apart from certain strong European societies and religions, the culture too many other people globally want to emulate is, unfortunately, that of the U.S.A.
Since American “culture” is successfully exported through the “swamping effect” of the American movie and television industry; the grave importance of Murrow’s speech is all the more necessary. Paradoxically it was exactly the movie industry --- albeit as more an independent production --- through which George Clooney very fortunately brought the life and speeches of Edward R. Murrow to the attention of the world.
Murrow’s speech to the RTNDA began with opening remarks which quantified his need to broach, at the time, a contentious but necessary subject.”
“Our history will be what we make it. “And if there are any historians about fifty or a hundred years from now, and there should be preserved the kinescopes for one week of all three networks, they will there find recorded in black and white, or colour, evidence of the escapism and insulation from the realities of the worlds in which we live.”
Murrow noted that in the television schedules of all networks between the hours of 8 and 11 p.m. one would find only brief and “...spasmodic reference to the fact that this nation is in mortal danger.
“...during the daily peak viewing periods, television in the main insulates us
from the realities of the world in which we live. If this state of affairs
continues, we may alter an advertising slogan to read: LOOK NOW, PAY
LATER.
“...If there were to be a competition in indifference, in insulation from
reality, then Nero and his fiddle, Chamberlain and his umbrella could not find
a place on an early afternoon sustaining show. ...some courageous soul with
a small budget might be able to do a documentary telling what, in fact, we
have done --- and are still doing –-- to the Indians in this country. But that
would be unpleasant ... we must at all costs shield the sensitive citizens from
anything that is unpleasant. ------------------------
On the question of television Editorials, Murrow noted:
“It is much easier, much less troublesome to use the money-making
television and radio merely as a conduit through which to channel anything
that is not libellous, obscene or defamatory. In that way one has the illusion
of power without responsibility.
“What, then, is the answer? Do we merely stay in our comfortable nests,
concluding that the obligation of these instruments has been discharged
when we work at the job of informing the public for a minimum of time?
“I am frightened by the imbalance, the constant striving to reach the largest
possible audience for everything; by the absence of a sustained study of the
nation.“
“We are currently wealthy, fat, comfortable and complacent. Our mass
media reflect this. But unless we get up off our fat surpluses and recognize
that television in the main is being used to distract, delude, amuse and
insulate us, then television and those who finance it, those who look at it and
work at it, may see a totally different picture too late.
“I began by saying that our history will be what we make it. If we go on as
we are, then history will take its revenge, and retribution will not be limp in
catching up with us. ...and here might ensue a most exciting adventure --
exposure to ideas and the bringing of reality into the homes of the nation.
“To those who say people wouldn’t look, they wouldn’t be interested, they’re
too complacent, indifferent and insulated, I can only reply: There is, in one
reporter’s opinion, considerable evidence against that contention. But even if
they are right, what have they got to lose?
Because if they are right, and this instrument is good for nothing but to
entertain, amuse and insulate, then the tube is flickering now and we will see
the whole struggle is lost.
“This instrument can teach, it can illuminate; yes, and it can even inspire. But
it can do so only to the extent that humans are determined to use it to those
ends. Otherwise it is merely wires and lights in a box. There is a great and
perhaps decisive battle to be fought against ignorance, intolerance and
indifference. This weapon of television could be useful.”
‘The interesting point about Murrow’s life and his approach to the use of language in a spiritually-ennobled and thus upbuilding way is that his radio career emerged around roughly the same time-space that Hitler occupied, but essentially during World War II. History well records the fact that, unlike Murrow, Hitler used “the power of language” in such a charismatic way that it very effectively seduced and pressured a whole people to embrace an idea so dark and evil that it will forever stand as one of the worst examples of “man’s inhumanity to man”.
‘The prophetic insights of Edward R. Murrow, perhaps the most celebrated “lone voice” warning about the potential of radio and television for education and enlightenment to be subsumed by entertainment, have already been borne out. Television’s particularly insidious nature has seduced generation after generation to the belief that the present situation of hours of mindless drivel is “normal”.
This has been one of the main drivers towards complete superficiality in society, for it promotes continual and empty, puerile ‘chat’ about such shows. For, in truth; they do nothing more than produce more and more empty aspiritual humans walking the earth like zombies in a daze, and who thus do not live ‘real life’. Instead of using the time gifted to us to seek out the real gems of life --- as is our ordained purpose here --- hours of that precious time are wasted on “stuff” that in no way can ever benefit “spiritual growth”. Thus, we can never become aware of Truth, and therefore to all intents and purpose, we are “asleep” and walking toward spiritual death!
Of course, the great financial power of “media capitalism” will ensure that that downwards trend will become “more normalised” in Western societies at least.
In Summary: LANGUAGE, with its inherent “forming power” under the aegis of Creation-Law, can either uplift a people or drag them down. Upliftment or degradation will depend upon whether that medium is used to spiritualise the talents and abilities within the group or is used to pervert or coarsen those gifts. For from the thoughts are produced the words, and from the mouth via the respective language, the issue of those words. The words then frame or clothe the form of the corresponding activity or deed.
Let’s now consult the book that most of America in their many Christian-style denominations claim to live by: The Bible! The Book of Matthew offers the strongest pointer to this spiritually-lawful and precise relationship between the use of words for good, or for the opposite. In Chapter 12, verses 15:11 and 15:16-20 from the Fenton Bible he recounts how The Son of God “pulled no punches” as He admonishes His Disciples for their obtuseness.
“Listen and understand! What goes into the mouth does not corrupt the man; but what comes out of his mouth does corrupt him.”
And the sharp reply of Jesus to the Disciples for their continuing dullness:
“Are you ignorant even yet? Do you not know that everything going into the mouth proceeds to the stomach, and is from there evacuated? But what comes out from the mouth proceeds from the heart, and corrupts the man. For there come from the heart wicked thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, perjuries, blasphemies. These are what corrupt the man...”
Matthew further recounts how strongly Jesus rebuked the Pharisees intent on entrapping Him. In verses 34-36, he records this reference to the power inherent in language.
“You venomous breed! How can you preach purity, when you are yourselves depraved? For the mouth speaks from the overflow of the heart! The beneficent man draws from his treasury of purity, goodness; and the depraved man can only produce depravity, from his stores of depravity! I tell you, however, that every vile idea that men give expression to, they shall render a reason for it in the Day of Judgement”.
Reader: When it comes down to the overall state of global humanity, that’s how the vast majority stand in this 21st century --- totally obtuse with regard to the crucial acceptance of the knowledge of Divine Creation-Law! For we simply cannot deny that many of our now readily-accepted social mores actually do venture into the sure reality of “depravity”!
The insidious erosion of true “language-freedom” in the spiritual sense, especially pertaining to the Truth inherent within The Eternal Laws, is an unfortunate and ultimately debilitating consequence of such appeasement by primarily weak politicians of politically-weak regimes who set-in place “convenient legislation” that fawningly-serves their voters. In the process “Spiritual Ennoblement” is more surely eroded.
That kind of neutering process offers nothing more than a lowering of standards within the particular society because it rejects the vital necessity of sound, healthy discipline which is ultimately voiced through language. To use a “modern” term, it is simply a “dumbing-down” process.
As just one puerile example out of many thousands, just take the American T.V. series, “The Kardashians”. Who in their right mind would even bother to be interested in their silly, “spiritually-empty” lives? Yet millions of equally empty-headed “humans” are. But there, reader, may be seen the powerful “spiritual outworking” of the Eternal Law of Attraction! -------- “Birds of a feather flock together”!
Now, foul language in TV programmes is screened in the early evening when children and young people have access to “prime” viewing time. Perhaps it doesn’t matter anymore since most have smart phones with access to the web, on which literally “everything” is readily available anyway.
Iconic Hollywood movie “stars” that millions “look up to” have added their profane contribution as well. Despite there being hundreds of movies and their “stars” that fill this particular space, just two recent examples suffice here.
Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham in “Fast and Furious: Hobbs and Shaw”, the writers of which produced a script that is foul beyond words, may have believed they were just acting in one more block-buster of the series. However, “freedom of choice” is the ultimate arbiter in all things, and they too --- the two “stars” --- could have demanded changes to the script. But no! For the masses, look good, look tough, and let your too-large-an-ego “fill the screen”.
To add insult to it all, Johnson’s “spiritual home of Samoa” is the stage for the climactic end scenes. Unfortunately, the “elders” of his home village --- if they truly believed in the kind of Samoan “spiritual” ethos” Johnson attempted to promote in the movie --- should have condemned the script outright, and their “favourite son” for agreeing to it. But no! Samoa must give adulation to its most famous “export”. Only the foolish or blind play with and/or mock the inherent Sublimity and Power of the Force: “Spiritual”!
What these two so-called Hollywood icons and their script-writers seemed not to understand is that for movies to be really great, they do not need foul language. Many of the greatest movies and movie series used language in its more ennobled sense. And, of course, those movies are remembered for their elevated character.
In addition, it is bad enough when male actors accept befouled scripts, but it is inexcusable when actresses enthusiastically use the same polluted standards, for then decency has gone completely ----- and depravity has replaced it.
Perhaps the winner of the recent crop of Hollywood garbage films was the 2019 movie. “Good Boys”. Aimed at the pre-teen market; for sheer, unnecessary innuendo, and filth, it surely has few equals. The trailer, alone, was more than enough to “turn one’s stomach”. Those are examples of one brand of entertainment rubbish.
A more insidious genre is that where the Very Holiness of The Godhead is slandered, maligned, disparaged --- all for the sake of “entertainment”. In the gravest way possible, that kind of defamation stands indicted beyond words --- as do all who are closely associated with such “productions”!
What has happened to Western societies where, only a relatively few decades ago, respect for The Commandments was part of everyday life for many. Now, Hollywood scriptwriters especially, seem to go out of their way to transgress The Second Commandment as many times as the script will take. Yet the really great historical/Biblical/religious epics ---- free of such filth --- stand head and shoulders above the “modern garbage”!
Now in this decisive year of 2021, from out of a new kind of ‘protest movement’, a very different and rapidly developing threat has emerged to stalk the entire Western world. This insidious menace vociferously targets even genuine and “spiritually-responsible free speech”. Note that I said “spiritually-responsible free speech” --- thus plain and truthful logic.
So swiftly is this landscape changing that under the new tyranny of “cancel culture”, well-known authors are now subject to abuse and vitriol not seen even just at the beginning of the year. From an online article:
“High profile authors targeted include author J.K. Rowling, Jordan Peterson, Jeanine Cummins and Julie Birchill, and there are plenty more, many of whom we have never heard of. Some are deemed to have committed worse crimes than others, resulting in anything from mild censorship to accusations of insensitivity, cultural appropriation, misogyny, racism or transphobia, while others have had their book contracts revoked --- and writers must learn to navigate this moralistic new world.”
MODERN “COMEDY”
This subject requires its own short but sharp Sub-Section! There was once in the 20th century a “Golden Age of Comedy” which for a few decades featured primarily in Movie theatres. Generally speaking, it did not seek to denigrate, or marginalise, and certainly didn’t resort to outright “smut”. Usually referred to as “slapstick”, the formula was simple and basically innocuous overall. Fast forward to the late 20th century and also to now; comedians and even comediennes have become “stars”, drawing sell-out crowds to large venues and all televised for global consumption.
If we assess this “growing trend” from the final arbiter of The Divine Laws of Creation, in particular the immutable outworking of The Law of Reciprocal Action on human mores; the truly bizarre aspect of these “comedy-venues” is the large numbers of women who flock to them, to hear supposedly humorous sexual/lascivious commentary about them --- against their gender, against their very being as “women in Creation”!
Despite the obvious physical beauty of the primarily younger women who deem it cool and sophisticated to be there --- and perhaps to be noticed there --- what is supposed to be “ennobled femininity” in the woman of today is nowhere to be seen in the women who go to such places to be “entertained”. To further “rub salt” into their “suppurating, aspiritual, wounds”, the increasing numbers of comediennes are basically no different to their male counterparts when it comes to delivering blatant and ugly “smut”! And the crowds all laugh very loudly, and then go home pleased with themselves after a “sophisticated” and “wonderful” night out.
Reader, they too, have all been --- and not so subtly, either --- completely ensnared by the “Lucifer Principle”!
MODERN “MUSIC”
I think it is safe to say that the “Age of Enlightenment” and the Baroque era in particular saw the flowering of spiritually-ennobled music of such beauty that it has not been replicated since its “closing off” around the end of the 19th century. Incorporating the beauty of the Chromatic Scale inherent in Creation under the aegis of the “Law of Numbers”, that combination of pure mathematics over that time wrought the most sublime music that was possible for man to achieve.
I think we have brought this fact to your attention already, but we will state it again; the musical ability of those especial composers incarnated over those centuries, in developing such sublime musical beauty helped to prepare the way for the entry of Imanuel onto the Earth Plane with His Final Living Truth!
Fast-forward to the latter part of the 20th century and into our time now of the 21st; essentially from “Old World” Europe to “New World” America. Certainly, that country and its populace have produced great orchestras, composers and musicians, but like so much else from “American culture”, as we have strongly stated, most of the rest of the world seems to regard “the land of the free” as the best “thing” to emulate.
Those of us who are very thankful to not have to be part of that “insular agglomeration”, are nonetheless subjected in various ways and outlets to perhaps the lowest level of so-called “music” ever to assail spiritually-sensitive ears --- black “rap music”. Keenly adopted by the “Brown Brotherhood” of other races primarily, “rap competitions” are now an entrenched part of even “white” societies across the globe.
From the point of view of genuine “spiritual ennoblement”, in its primary essence and insidious influence, that “stuff” rates as seriously-aspiritual and thus dangerous rubbish. Generally characterised by crude lyrics, foul language and commensurate gestures at live performances, it is nonetheless the preferred “musical diet” for hundreds of millions of ardent fans worldwide. Punk Rock once filled that niche.
When we speak of “rap music”, we necessarily relate that “creation” to angry, alienated, black U.S. males. What is so clear here is how swiftly that race/ culture can turn its back on a long history of African musical harmonies and genuine musicality that produced great Black musicians, bands and composers in the “new homeland” of America, but then produce an offshoot that carries not one ounce of that musical depth.
Culminating in the great era of “Soul Music”; what came after that in the form of R. & B., and then to “Rap”, could not even begin to compare, in terms of the sheer musicality, of “Soul”, for the sound and lyrics actually spoke to the soul and, for one, gave hope to the “Black struggle” for equality.
Whilst we have singled out just one genre of “music” to add to the purpose of this Discourse, the global effect of this single “entity” is such that on its own it has created a very large and vocal, global “rap culture”.
You might say, so what? Does it matter, and is it really that bad? Since we are talking about “The Death of Spiritual Ennoblement” in the human race and we are the last excrescence of our kind currently alive on earth; yes it really does matter!
Where there is no effort or attempt to bring “Spiritual Ennoblement” to our activities and deeds, that “loss” simply introduces more “nails” to our “collective coffin”. In the case of “rap culture”; just one more very large step downwards! If we are not blind to the truth here, then we will understand that the emergence of certain kinds of “music” so emerges under the influence of the “Lucifer Principle” too.
So even though we have certainly made beneficial gains “across-the-board” and become much more enlightened in the past two centuries, the kinds of “gains” we have made have not really been sufficient for us to say: We are now “spiritually ennobled”! Despite all manner of legislation to “lift societies”, below the surface there nonetheless simmers a strong human propensity for all “the other stuff”, which, under the sick, aspiritual, mantra of “My Rights”, floods societies today.
THE “ABERRANT PROMOTION” OF NEW “RAINBOW GENDERS”
This rapidly developing trend of what on truth is ultimately irrational reality anyway, has shown us that in the fast-evolving global movement of “anything goes” and “everything” is allowed to be, so-called old-fashioned views are not permitted any place in this “new social order”! It has now very strangely become dangerous to have an opinion different to that which “legislation” has already decreed “is the right way for all”!
Mutual respect for differing views, once readily acceptable, is now perversely under serious threat from new and far less tolerant Western/U.N. “social-agenda” goals! So much so that in terms of our indispensable but mostly very ordinary everyday human bodies necessary for life on earth; under this pervasive new political and social-engineering umbrella, even views that nonetheless absolutely resonate with precise and unchangeable biological parameters, have now become perilous to voice!
That is despite the obvious fact that those perfect processes have decreed the very DNA which, logically, brings forth each specific life-form and, in its development, gives each one its singular perfection of form and purpose!
So on the one hand we have completely unchangeable, biological processes that have “produced” perfection of form and purpose in all creatures on planet earth and have done so since the dawn of life on it. Yet on the other we have human beings who perversely still somehow want it to be different. In the strangest of incongruities, perfectly clear biological realities seem to be completely lost on many Western politicians in this 21st century.
Instead, bury what is eminently logical and in its place pander or grovel to the new rapidly-evolving ‘movement’ that not only threatens once-standard views, but seeks to punish anyone who will not fall into line with their agenda! In the process, use high-sounding ostensibly-altruistic ‘human rights’ jargon to get your way, so that everyone else bows to it.
In concert, therefore, a critical consideration: Will this growing chorus of vociferous intimidation induce nervous politicians to enact legislation to prevent any challenge to the stated agenda of this new “social order”? For by such weak political acquiescence, they who agitate for pernicious change would virtually be permitted to rule society! What would unarguably then be a ‘new dark age’ would, by its very nature, demand the neutralisation of what are --- in serious reinforcement --- absolutely unchangeable, biological realities, to which the rest of the populace would have to submit. True “freedom of speech” would become more of a crime than it is even now!
By way of example, the Government of Tasmania became the first in the world to introduce legislation whereby the sex of a newly-born does not appear on the birth certificate. The question that surely arises is: Why didn’t the attending doctors simply refuse to obey such an insidiously-draconian ‘law’? For they are the medical experts who in at least most hospitals examine all new-born to ensure that they are healthy and exactly formed according to unchangeable biological parameters! And therefore, quite obviously, readily identify the gender of all new-born by --- guess how --- yes, you got it, the baby’s sex organs.
Is that not truly amazing, reader? In truth it is so absurd as to be laughable! Do politicians not look in their mirrors to see “what they are”? What kind of politicians would debate the issue of the sex of a new-born to a point where such truly ‘mad legislation’ becomes the ‘law of any land’?
How much further will primarily Western ‘law-making politicians’ carry this very spiritually-dangerous trend? Will it continue to where this newest and most insidious social-engineering concept brings us to a point where all “genuine freedom of speech”, all logic, is subsumed by what would unarguably then be a society dangerously close to a kind of dictatorial totalitarianism? For if it is not tempered by even just a small amount of natural logic, then the ultimate goal would seem to be subjugation of mostly, in the end, weakly-acquiescing masses!
In what now seems to be an unstoppable, rapidly-growing social-engineering objective, politicians in more and more countries are enacting more and more of what is ultimately dangerously-deceptive legislation, clearly designed to force change in the very thought processes of whole populations. Two well-known twentieth century dictators, through programs underpinned by incredible evil, did exactly that.
Today, a different kind of political tyranny, driven primarily by women demanding equality across-the-board, to the ludicrous point of legislating for public toilets to be “gender inclusive”. (Joe Biden’s Executive Order, for one).
It is worth noting that successive American administrations before this present one, publicly held to a ‘dictum’ first stated by President George Washington.
“Above all, the pure light of revelation has had an influence on mankind and increased the blessings of society. It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible.”
Biden’s ‘people’ have certainly ‘loosened those reins’ somewhat. Have we seen any increase in “the blessings of society”? The emergence of the obscenely wealthy ‘one-percenters’ says no! We should therefore ask ourselves what the real influence is that is driving this unprecedented “social-engineering” direction. It is clearly not Higher Inviolate Law!
In response to Biden’s Executive Order, a sudden, back-tracking, jarring rethink --- by women, of course --- quite rightly over the safety of their daughters who would be in a place where men simply should not be! Those were once the rules of a more intelligent world that we are very strangely leaving behind.
In addition, if not already in place, the equally unbelievable idea that “changing rooms” in sports complexes and at swimming venues also be included as “gender open”. Perfect places for evil predatory males to flaunt themselves. Should that kind of arrant nonsense ever be permitted to raise its ugly head across global nations, then the politicians who had legislated for it would stand indicted as --- what exactly? There are simply no words adequate enough to describe such outright stupidity!
Man and woman! Necessarily different, but each perfected to form and function! Therefore, as has been “well-recognised” for millennia, necessitating commensurately-different but very obvious gender needs. What is so difficult to understand here?
The question I personally ask of you all --- Western politicians, E.U. politicians and United Nations representatives --- why do you believe you all have the right to force these kinds of totally illogical changes on the populace? Do you honestly think that you can all actually legislate against biological reality?
That is a truly strange and bizarre notion! No politician can enact legislation of his or her choosing with impunity, as if there are no consequences for every single decision made. More especially when a decision is legislatively-compelling, thus affecting many others.
If a global referendum were held on this ”new direction”, it is more than probable that Western politicians, particularly, would be surprised by a silent but very confused majority mostly too afraid to speak out!
In concert, the generally ignoble state of at least most Western cultures and societies in this 21st century we can liken to the mantra at the head of this Discourse. It was the driving ethos of the 20th century English occultist, Alistair Crowley: “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law”.
Curiously, he, too, was active in Europe at the precise time when The Grail Message was written. As with a number of other occultists there around the same time, the protocols he established for his many quite stupid followers were clearly formulated under the influence of the “Lucifer Principle”.
Let us now see what one of the “big three” --- Islam --- has to say on our current, critical, “spiritual reality”; in particular, an especially contentious subject! In perhaps a curious twist, M.M. Ali --- or more particularly his commentary on a relevant Koranic verse --- can certainly be applied to latter-day Western mores, for it tells us what we in the West no longer hold sacred in family relationships, and thus commensurately in our rotting societies. From chapter 24, verse 2 of “Ali’s” Koran:
‘The adulteress and the adulterer, flog each of them (with) a hundred stripes, a and let not pity for them detain you from obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.’
We are certainly not advocating flogging everyone who transgresses in this area, for we are ever mindful of the great Admonition: “I demand Mercy”! In any case, the Justice system of the Western world would surely need thousands of official “whip-wielders” if that law were ever enacted to its fullest extent. What we want to make you aware of here is what Ali says about that verse; about virtues that once mattered. Take note of what we have italicised and underlined from M.M. Ali’s commentary.
2a. ‘Chastity, as a virtue, is not given the first place in modern civilised society, and hence adultery is not considered a sufficiently serious offence to subject the guilty party to any punishment except the payment of damages to the injured husband. The breach of the greatest trust which can be imposed in a man or a woman, the breach which ruins families, destroys household peace, and deprives innocent children of their loving mothers, is not looked upon as seriously as the breach of trust of a few pounds. Hence the Islamic law seems to be too severe to a Westerner.’
What especially stands out in many societies across the globe now --- perhaps more specifically in the West --- is the ready acceptance of what was once recognised as “last taboos”; in particular the active promoting of homosexuality and lesbianism as somehow being a natural human “thing”. Moreover, in political polling of Western societies, increasing numbers of probably otherwise intelligent people are inexorably drawn into a very insidious web of aspiritual/political conditioning to support legislation that legitimises such an appalling aberration of Divine Creation-Law!
As with every direction the human race has voluntarily embarked upon, few have ever embraced the Higher Spiritual ethos; and that is certainly so in the 21st century. As we have stated, with the sanction of the U.N. “Human Rights” agenda, a new trend has very quickly become established in at least most Western societies. The “previously unacceptable” is now legislated for by complicit politicians in many countries, with the result that it spills over into the corporate world that, previously, stood firm and objective on this subject.
Companies now pride themselves on “getting the rainbow tick” and producing slogans such as “bring your whole self to work”. In addition, H.R. committees within so-called ‘progressive companies’ enact policies to support their L.G.B.T employees. If you didn’t already know it, reader; L.G.B.T. stand s for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender. But wait: There’s more!
In 2019 in primarily Western societies, this trend “exploded” to the point where there are now over 70 Gender terms that ‘define’ a person’s sexual preference or that represent how particular individuals choose to identify themselves, so it is now L.G.B.T.+.
Apart from the terms, homosexual and lesbian, and perhaps bisexual, all of which have been around for a very long time, some more recent terms that are now commonplace are transgender and cross-dresser. Despite the fact that “Mother Nature” has decreed us all to be either male or female --- quite simple, really --- 21st century human societal protocols have added different notions to what will forever be the Natural Ordination of Unchangeable Biological Parameters!
We will not waste too much time on this so silly, but nonetheless exceptionally spiritually dangerous, “new trend” ---- it really isn’t worth the effort. If you are interested, however, Google Sam Killermann and/or Meg Bolger, creators of something called The-SafeZoneProject.com. The associated website lists all the new terms, but evidently not yet completed as it is a “work in progress”.
Just think, reader; just as we all have our individual DNA, perhaps all 7 billion of us on earth at this moment can each have our own individual gender term too. Let’s look at just a few of the more bizarre terms from their A-to-Z list.
Agender adj.: a person with no (or very little) connection to the traditional system of gender ... of either man or woman ... who sees themselves as existing without gender. Sometimes called gender neutrois, gender neutral, or genderless. (That is definitely Aspiritual.)
Also; bicurious: biphobia; cisgender; cisnormativity; feminine-of-center; masculine-of-center; fluid(ity); gender fluid; gender variant; heteronormativity; LGBTQ; GSM; DSG; TGNC abbr. shorthand or umbrella terms for all (people) who have a non-formative (or queer) gender or sexuality.... And there are many more.....
So insidious and unnatural has all this become that even the toy giants, Lego and Martell, have begun producing “gender-neutral” toys.
What is all this arrant nonsense and just plain sheer Garbage? This is not just a further distortion of the Natural Laws of Creation. No: This unbelievably stupid trend should be seriously recognised as just about the last and lowest point that societies could fall to, and therefore condemned outright by all right-thinking human beings. Such is the insidious nature of the new “genders”, that the actual threat of criminal proceedings now hangs over the heads of ordinary citizens who might wish to speak out against this new Dark Age of Unreason!
Thankfully, however, the sure outworking of the great prophecies will very correctly wipe these people out of existence. The few who are left will then never again be coerced socially and politically to conform to human dictates and decrees that will deservedly set the legislators and followers of such aberrant beliefs and practices on the path to The Second Death!
For apart from birthing deformities that do occur; in the normal course of procreation and birth we are all born of primarily just two sexual configurations --– Male or Female. Therefore, in terms of the optimal, natural, human configuration, subsequently deciding to be something different to that norm renders one, in every natural sense, “abnormal”. Grammatically, the word means not normal.
Now, before you all condemn that term and label the author of it “homophobic” --- as if that condition for a human male were somehow not normal --- get this understanding into your heads.
PART II gave you the knowledge of The Divine Laws of Creation, and within those unassailable and inviolable parameters will be found the answer to every human and non-human situation in the whole of Creation.
So, in the birth of a “less-than-perfect” baby, it is only the outer form, the body, the physical shell that is compromised. The inner person is not. That means that any “sexual-preference choice” which that individual might choose to make in its later adult life is exactly that --- its choice! For in learning about those Divine Laws, you also learned about the precise reciprocal outworking of them when they are transgressed; for we humans are the only “cretins” in the whole of CREATION that do so.
Continuing this line of very strange reality: Currently, in the queerest possible way, the act of referring to oneself in the 3rd person --- “they”, “them” or “ze” / “zir” --- has become popular. This is where a person identifies him or herself as “gender neutral”, and where society has even gone as bizarrely far down the rabbit hole as to ‘identify’ another category, which is ‘defined’ as “third gender”.
“Third gender”. noun:
Meaning: A person who does not identify with either man or woman, but
identifies with another gender. This gender category is used by societies
that recognise three or more genders, both contemporary and historic,
and is also a conceptual term meaning different things to different people
who use it as a way to move beyond the gender binary.
The fact that all this is grammatically incorrect just for starters should be a clear sign to Western societies of how sick they now are. This insidious and quite mad trend increasingly dispenses with the use of Mr, Ms, Mrs etc. It is becoming more acceptable to tick Mx. --- which means gender neutral.
Reader: Let us try and awaken these people to their incredibly arrant nonsense and stupidity and hit them with a very pertinent but so obvious question: Do all these people not shower or bathe and not at some point look in their mirrors and see what must surely be obvious to them? For unless they are born hermaphrodites, they, too, will all naturally possess either a penis, or a vagina!
And guess what: Every “mother’s son” --- that means each and every one of us --- live and breathe and walk this earth BECAUSE we came from a female womb, down the Vaginal birth canal, into which nine months previously a Male Penis (for there aren’t any other kinds that naturally produce sperm) had ejaculated that male sperm to produce “us”!
In addition, people, should “QWERTY” women become pregnant and proceed to a full-term birth, guess what comes out? Yes, you got it! Either a boy child with a penis, or a girl child with a vagina! Isn’t that so naturally amazing? Where does all that “other stuff’ fit then?
Surely, only the most vacuous of humans would dare to challenge “Mother Nature” in all her wondrous and sublime NATURALNESS and stupidly believe that “SHE” would sanction any humanly-decreed “alternative configuration”. The other sure way of knowing “what one is” can be “deduced” every time one urinates.
Is all this in the “too-hard-basket”? To actually have to question how and why all this “stuff” has come to pass absolutely unequivocally illustrates that the human race really has reached an undeniably and truly insane point. And we make no apologies for stating that “Forever-Truth”!
For right at the very beginning of this Ordained Work, we affirmed in Admonishing warning The Words of Imanuel, Who is The Prophesied Son of Man, Who is The Creative Will of God, that:
“The ‘Forces of Nature’ are the Expression of
The Will of God on Earth”!
Reader: It is truly sickening to one’s Living Spirit to have to write this nauseating “stuff”. Accepting that it is one’s primary ordained purpose in life that it be so written, it nonetheless generates “anger”, but it is the measured “spiritual force” of “righteous anger”! For we know that Divine Truth --- in its Decreed Ordination in this very strange 21st century:
“Makes Straight The Way of The LORD”!
So now, freedom of choice has been replaced with a lawful expectation that, on this new reality, employers and employees support the equally-new status quo, irrespective of personal opinions or even religious beliefs. In truth, such a policy is actually totalitarian for it demands and enforces compliance to ‘new norms’ once rightly considered aberrant, inevitably leading to dull, resigned acceptance on the part of those affected, or legally forced to acquiesce!
Here’s a question: Did the Allied Powers just 80 odd years ago not fight the most destructive war in human history, precisely to defeat “totalitarianism”? And in doing so, leave a legacy of war of around 60 million dead? How soon we forget. It has always been known that if we do not learn the lessons that history teaches us, we are doomed to repeat them. In this End-Time, however, a very different outcome for us dear humans --- as you now well-understand, reader!
Now, “Gay Pride” is celebrated in large and raucous annual parades in cities across the globe. Even the wonderfully-expressive word of the English language, “gay”, has been hijacked for a totally aspiritual purpose; the acronym, “Good as you”.
Protective legislation has ensured that no one may speak out against such revelry and aspiritually-aberrant behaviour and practice, so we all more and more rapidly descend into a latter-day Sodom and Gomorrah!
For my part, it is sufficient to bring out the “Big Gun”, the Great Prophet, Isaiah:
The “Earth” also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof; because they
have transgressed the “Laws”,
changed the decrees,
broken the everlasting covenant.
Therefore has the curse devoured the “Earth”, and those that dwell therein
are desolate: therefore the inhabitants of the “Earth” are burned,
and few men left.’
What might Judaism and Christianity say about all of that aberrant “gender stuff”? Because there is a close correlation between the Torah and the Bible on the severe Admonition to live correctly in this area, in this Section we will lump them together!
The one organisation that is surely meant to stand up and oppose it vehemently has to be the Christian Church. Now, reader, why are we saying that? Well: Because the very Book that they say they swear by --- the Bible --- says so in no uncertain terms. In fact, the words of condemnation used are some of the strongest in the English language, anathema, and abomination! Surely that says it all. In a brave stance, some Christian organisations are attempting to stand firm against this now unstoppable wave of “dark practice”.
Throughout this Work, much of it has necessarily been directed at the religion of Islam. Yet despite all that we have written about the many errors in that “religion”, it is at least firm enough in this correct knowledge to stand against it and condemn it outright.
Those Christian churches and groups who pander to this rapidly growing “spiritual disease” probably take their “reasoning” from a completely distorted notion of what The Love of God really constitutes. For if we think really deeply about it, the very “spiritual health and wellbeing” of all human societies ultimately pivots on this key requirement! We get this right, or we fall!
SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND CREATION-LAW!
Sexual orientation! Personal choice -- or other? Homosexuality and lesbianism: Natural -- or an aberration? What does Creation Law say?
As a general rule among probably most societies historically, anything outside the man/woman union was, for the most part, regarded as unacceptable, thus running the gamut from undesirable, to offensive, to anathema. In some societies even to this day, punishable by death. Moreover, many cultures regarded -- and still regard --- the fertile woman as a blessing. When high infant mortality rates were once the norm in all societies, producing-unions maintained the numbers necessary for a society to be sufficiently viable for just simple survival to begin with, and for expansion and self-protection as a necessary adjunct.
So, what has changed today? Whilst there have always been cultures where non-heterosexual preferences were tolerated/accepted/embraced, the attitude and rulings of the Christian Church in this area primarily shaped the overall ethos of Western Nations. Now, however, changing societal attitudes and government-enacted legislation has seen a major and quite unprecedented shift away from just the legalisation of civil unions and other kinds of relationships to full marriage ceremonies in homosexual and lesbian unions. The prevailing sentiment seems no longer to be what once rightly was the across-the-board non-acceptance of relationships outside the man/woman paradigm.
However, in a truly strange and curious, but ultimately hypocritical, twist, the Teachings of Jesus are often used to justify both sides of the Christian debate/clash, even from the pulpits of opposing ministers. Perhaps this aberration of irreconcilable-divergence stems from two very different interpretations of the so-called Christian-love ethos.
The incorrect belief that Jesus died to cleanse all human beings of their evil dispositions (i.e., everyone’s sins) in His ‘great act of Love’ is seemingly the basis for an ‘all-forgiving’ attitude among some Christians towards virtually anything and everything. For it ostensibly seeks to ‘emulate’ that ‘loving sacrifice’ in the Church’s’ interpretation of so-called ‘Christian love’, which forgives even serious transgressions, sometimes against the very aegis of Divine Law Itself. Whilst there should ultimately be forgiveness -- tempered by compassion of course -- true justice must still nevertheless prevail.
In the final analysis, however, what is mooted as love is anything but, because it invariably fails to take into account Justice. Creation-Law absolutely decrees that Love and Justice cannot be separated. They are one! So where one is used without the other, The Law of Balance (previously explained) is then seriously transgressed.
Love: A small word, but one that has inadvertently caused so many problems due to the wrongful application of it in the unfortunate belief that it was always correctly applied. Because of its spiritually weak, earthly interpretation, we might designate the overall concept inherent in it as being almost a ‘religion of earthly love’. For it is one thing to reverentially proclaim a belief in this Power of Love, but another to then apply it so wrongly that its distorted application produces the worst kinds of injustices and totally aberrant doctrines.
We need to therefore understand that The Love of The Divine, which produced the incomprehensible vastness of the physical universes thus permitting us our material home --- is actually severe, objective, and impartial in its outworking. And therefore cannot possibly be equated with the weak, emotional, earthly caricature that we have produced in the human rendition of the word love.
Interestingly, and certainly spiritually-alarmingly, current societal university/intellectual attitudes promote views such as that recommended by some “sexual researchers” who have proposed that students: “... regardless of their sexual orientation...” should be allowed “... to explore a range of sexual identities and their implications.”
One would have thought that any individual would have the free-will right to do so in any case. One does not need a university graduate to state a fundamental personal right to experiment and make a particular choice. It seems that it was important to recognise:
“...the diversity and differences which existed within communities...” which would benefit(?) “...gay, lesbian, bisexual and heterosexual youth alike”.
What is interesting in this case is that such views pressurise youth into possibly believing that the average boy/girl relationship --- which, by the way, is the only kind that will naturally produce offspring to keep societies viable --- might somehow be unsound. In addition, the impressionable young must therefore be able to ‘chop and change’ to suit prevailing ‘liberating expectations’. The ultimate horror in the present climate of inane ‘political correctness’ is, of course, to be labelled homophobic or something similar.
From the standpoint of The Divine Laws of Creation, we are not the least bit interested with any individual’s personal choice --- in anything! What we have stated throughout the pages of this book is that the inviolable outworking of The Eternal Spiritual Laws is absolute --- for every decision made.
For the purposes of this particular discussion, then: If the Laws contained in the Bible, for example, are absolute, then the kinds of advice promoted by university researchers for young people to ‘liberate’ themselves from the so-called ‘debilitating constraints of homophobic views’ are, in reality, nothing more than an advocacy of unnecessary and potentially “spiritually-dangerous” experimentation.
In the final aberrant and sick excrescence of it all, it is a view driven by the foolish emotionalism contained in the current global ‘My Rights’ mindset, which we address in a later Discourse. Why do we say it is foolish emotionalism? Well, here is why!
It is precisely because, under the ultimate and non-negotiable parameters of Creation-Law, any actual ‘debilitating constraint’ is, by extension, then actually present in all so-called ‘liberating sexual practices’. And, therefore, also in sexual orientation preferences different to that which The Eternal Laws decree as being spiritually correct.
So, the actual ‘debilitating constraint’ here is brought about simply by shackling oneself to completely incorrect beliefs.
In any case what social scientists determine for themselves and Western societies is rendered totally irrelevant by the sacrosanct nature of Creation-Law! For whatever choices we make will bring the reciprocal return; without fail. That is the inviolable outworking of The Law of Reciprocal Action operating in the lives of each of us. Therefore, the belief that one can somehow become spiritually-liberated by choosing a sexual preference which does not encompass the Divinely-Ordained man/woman union is, in a word, wrong!
Therefore: Whilst our explanations may not fit with present societal mores, it is nevertheless especially important for young people to know that the age-old boy/girl relationship which brings more boys and girls onto the earth is not only perfectly okay, but unequivocally derives from The Eternal Laws!
Now reader, here is a very strange “development” --- primarily in Western societies --- and it is this. There is a particular insidious pressure directed to all young adults who buy into the “stuff” of this world, and it is primarily derived from the medium of visual entertainment such as movies and reality TV “dating” shows and, of course, the web and ‘social media’. It is, in effect, “musical beds”. The promoted idea is that by ‘sleeping around’ with multiple partners, one has the best chance of finding the right ‘partner for life’.
That now socially-acceptable notion which completely dispenses with any thought of higher or spiritually-elevated considerations therewith strangely supposes that the best ‘sexual partner’ must make the best ’life-companion’.
That ‘best partner” will obviously produce strong feelings of attachment or even bonding for both and may indeed induce love-associated feelings toward each other. However, the very fact that the physical was put first before all else, means that earthly emotionalism has probably been the greatest driver of the process. (Do we ever wonder why relationships and marriages do not last anywhere near as long as they once did?)
So, here’s the truly dumb thing, reader, and which clearly contributes to “shorter-time” relationships! What the proponents and participants of this “sexual carousel” seem not to understand is that they could never ever know if the ‘next one’ or ‘the one after that’ might not have been a ‘better life-companion’. By the way, we are talking about the only natural association that will be permitted to exist in Creation after the “great human cull” --- that of man and woman!
On that crucial Eternal-Law absolute, let’s pause for just one moment for a serious “reality-check! Right! For any human being to deny the very obvious fact that the physical form of woman perfectly complements the physical form of man in a natural union of intimacy is just plain laughable. The two forms very obviously provide the only “natural” connection possible.
Therefore, despite what a very loud and rapidly-increasing, spiritually-ignorant, global rabble stridently promote as being natural, any and every other intimate union of human beings in physical form is, by their totally incomprehensible definition, rendered naturally unnatural.
That is not to say that such unions may be deemed politically and socially acceptable in the various cultures and societies of the world, but that is an entirely different matter. As we have constantly stated, the ordained purpose of this Work is to elucidate Divine Creation-Law which decrees/commands only naturalness throughout Creation -- especially and including the World of Matter and for its inhabitants --- us! All else -- which can only come into existence via the free-will volition of we human beings in any case -- must, and will, be finally driven by the Pressure and Power of that very Law to its demise, a polite word in this case.
Liberal ideas such as we have examined in this overall segment, anchored primarily in the intellectually-derived ‘Human Rights’ mentality now solidly entrenched in mainstream Western thinking, have thus found their final end-excrescence enacted in the earthly legislative law of many countries. In ‘earthly law’ where ‘voiced opposition’ to such laws can, in certain circumstances, be perversely deemed an actual ‘criminal’ offence.
Dr Alan Duggan, an Australian researcher into “Male Health”, has noted that anecdotal evidence from studies carried out in Canada and Australia suggest that young male suicide statistics may lean as much as 30 per cent to more suicides ‘among homosexual men than straight men’. From that line of research alone, one can see that the higher suicide rate amongst this group does not indicate any kind of ‘liberation’ at all -- rather the opposite. Dr Duggan opined that the research results pointed to a sexual orientation/identity crisis in this group.
In the world of psychiatry/psychology, the debate over “Nature versus Nurture” still continues. Certainly, the notion that a child can be “nurtured” to accept an opposite mindset as to what gender it is or supposed to be is well-documented. Invariably deriving from the parent’s decision, raising a child ‘sexless’ or ‘gender neutral’ is a total aberration and an offence against Natural Law, for it actually deprives the child of that essential and God-Willed naturalness! The subsequent karma deriving from such practices will fall heavily upon the parents.
What seems like a ‘bright idea’ or even a new ‘parenting fashion craze’ of ‘letting the child be whatever it wants’ is so totally unnatural that it would be laughable if it were not for the great damage done to the child.
It’s really simple, people! The child is either a boy or a girl and will always be so even if dressed in ‘gender-neutral’ clothing. In addition, from the point of view of Creation-Law; to somehow make the child ‘sexless’ means that such silly ‘social-engineering’ endeavours to remodel its very personality.
We have already illuminated the Creation-Law processes of how we become who we are in the Discourse on our ORIGINS. Any idea to the contrary is, in a word, WRONG!
Such unbelievably stupid actions by “politicians” is inexcusable, for the child is then conditioned to grow and develop into ‘something’, but what?
What comes next? Will we be told we cannot divulge our sex for fear of offending someone? These times now are our last chance to reject such nonsense and correct our too-many areas of distorted rubbish. It is way past the time for the pendulum to swing the other way’ and for global humanity to begin to ‘become ‘natural’ once more! The word, natural, stems from the word, ‘nature’. And that surely says it all! All our aberrant “stuff” has long been just “wrong conditioning”!
On the L.G.B.T. front, if we really wish to understand how and why the numbers of so-called “gay” communities are undergoing relatively-recent exponential growth --- and it’s not because more people are “coming out” --- we must turn to The Divine Laws of Creation for a definitive answer.
For the sure outworking of those immutable, inviolable, and thus unchangeable Laws on all human, free-will, decisions have brought us to a point where only the surgical knife of Divine Law Justice can cleanse us of our moral decline. So shall it be!
Reader: In PART II you were comprehensively exposed to the infallible Perfection of Divine Creation-Law, so you know they take no account whatsoever of crass human intellectualism. The Eternal Laws Rule; we do not! So, let us put this very bluntly! We, as individuals, choose our personal fate, and thus our final outcome. We therefore “choose” to be “natural”, or “unnatural”.
Since all “unnatural” practices are deemed “anathema” and an “abomination” by The Living Laws of Creation, the very aberrant world of homosexuality and lesbianism doesn’t have much more time left before it, too, disappears with all the rest of our aspiritual human garbage slotted for destruction!
Homosexuality, accepted openly in some cultures for a very long time, has really only “come out” in previously non-accepting cultures in just recent decades. Now the notion and practice is for the most part main-stream acceptable --- even in global Christendom! Yet the very practice that characterises the physical side of homosexuality --- anal sexual intercourse --- was responsible for a global “safe-sex” campaign because of the spread of HIV Aids, accepted as deriving from that very practice. Prior to developing a more or less effective treatment, the disease produced a wasting of the body resulting in many deaths.
Let’s get brutally real here people! The female Vagina for the male Penis,
in its perfect and beautiful naturalness, can never ever be likened to the act of a
male Penis inside a male anus! That is the absolute reality here! There is no
other!
Reader: Remember this?
“I set before you life and death. Therefore choose life, that you and your posterity may live.”
This punishingly-severe warning from out of Creation-Law Itself; does not refer to everyday earthly death. No: It refers to the “death” of our self-conscious selves --- The Second Death --- which you now have detailed knowledge of. The reference to life, on the other hand, refers to the potential to achieve Eternal Life in our True home in The Spiritual Realm of Creation!
So once again, and purely for the purposes of this discussion; if The Eternal Laws of Creation are not believed by us foolish humans to be absolute, or not believed to exist at all, then disbelievers should simply continue to live on in their disbelief, particularly of the effects of The Law of Reciprocal Action visiting any hard suffering upon them. In all cases, that would be under the aegis and increased power inherent in “the whirlwind constant”!
We sow the wind with our personal decisions, but we reap the consequences under the vastly amplified power of “the whirlwind”! Remember this from the beginning? “For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who disbelieve, no proof is possible.”
So, disbelievers: Do not, then, apportion blame elsewhere if personal decisions and desires should visit return effects vastly different to what you might have wished for -- before the fact.
To help us all understand the “mechanics” of how such an aberrant, completely unnatural, distortion of Creation-Law could take place to begin with and then become so solidly entrenched politically, religiously, and socially that it is now regarded as “natural”, we need to embrace the only knowledge that can help in that very necessary understanding.
Moreover, whoever wishes to be here in the prophesied Kingdom of Peace on earth, it is necessary, under the inviolable aegis of The Law of Rebirth, to fully comprehend the How and the Why before total societal collapse is upon us. To that end, the following Text clearly explains what we all need to know.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
WOMAN AND MAN
IMANUEL/ABD-RU-SHIN:
“SON OF MAN”
And “ETERNAL MEDIATOR”!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“If there were not still a few...” “...verily it would be better if a movement
of the Hand of God would sweep away these caricatures of womanhood
from the smooth soil of this glorious Creation”!
But for the sake of those few faithful ones...”
Reader: Note the following --- again!
Isaiah: “Few men left...”
Jesus: “Were the times not cut short, not a man would be saved...”
Despite the fact that we have just heard from the Absolute Power of Creation, the problem for global humanity is that pitifully “few” know of The Grail Message of The Son of Man!
Therefore, to still offer the same Truth, but from a more readily accepted source; in the today-world of the Christian, the Book of Leviticus provides essential knowledge in this regard. One’s personal views -- or perhaps sexual orientation choice -- would surely engender one of two reactions when examining this particular Book of the Bible; a strong or angry emotional one, or perhaps more relaxed acceptance; perhaps even relief derived from grateful recognition that one’s intuitive views were correct after all.
Regardless of individual views, however, and even though perhaps more addressing the Jewish Priesthood from the Tribe of Levi, ‘Leviticus’ nevertheless provides a valuable insight and guide for more correct spiritual living than current so-called ‘liberating’ views are probably prepared to accept.
For example, Verses 6-29 of Chapter 18 of ‘Leviticus’ are sub-headed:
THE LAWS OF AFFINITY, AND MARRIAGES AND SEX
The most interesting aspect of those twenty-three Scriptural Verses (also Chapter 20:1-21) is the fact that they embody much of the cultural/social and moral foundation of most societies, cultures, and religions globally. Why should that be so? Historically, why have non-Christian societies also regarded these kinds of ‘Rules for Life’ as fundamental for their social stability too? Alluded to or written about in other religious works, the detailed substance of the Sexual Laws in the face-book of the Christian religion --- the Bible --- quite simply supplies the Spiritual and moral parameters for correct human living.
(Historically for the Jewish race, reader; the ancient tribe of Levi --- basically the Priesthood of Israel --- kept this knowledge sacred for the whole of the race.)
Copulation in the manner of a man and woman where it is actually not so, is therein labelled an abomination. In the present climate of “anything goes”, such words are mostly regarded as just irksome religious irrelevance. However, under the inviolable outworking of The Creation Laws of Life, they are absolutely relevant, and ultimately death-dealing in the second sense.
The aberrant sexual proclivities of human beings go back a very long way. Most of the ancient empires had cities or regions noted for their licentiousness and were sometimes even state-sanctioned. In the same way that we have “sex-tourism” today, the same existed in other ages. However, what is vastly different in the present is the “electronic medium” of instant, real-time, communication, where uncountable numbers of web-sites proudly flaunt their deviant images. Sex-tourism is thus given the ultimate boost, for “punters” can more easily plan their “tours”.
One aspect of this “dark stuff” is the “live show” featuring virtually whatever one wishes to pay for. Particular cities in Asia and Central and South America have become notorious for such “shows”. Some feature even “bestiality” as the “speciality of the house”. The ultimate penalty for such aberration “features” in the Book of Leviticus, and thus in the eventual, and very hard, “Reciprocal return” for all who actively engage in and/or promote such “activities”.
Perhaps the most difficult and ugliest “offense” to understand and come to terms with, is what has been reported in some third world African countries in the past few decades --- “baby rape”! Even just the mention of it produces a degree of disgust and anger like no other deed could ever do. The sheer horror of the aftermath, surgeons have then to deal with, surgically --- and “emotionally”!
Adult males with no milk of human kindness, no decency, and clearly without conscience: What should their punishment be? Is there anything that would be severe enough for such a terrible act? Perhaps “castration”; so that he could never offend again, yet still live the rest of his sick life, but without that part of his male anatomy.
The natural human/societal repugnance toward sexual involvement in practices such as paedophilia, incest and bestiality etc., clearly reveal that abhorrence to activities which encompass the immoral and unnatural is therefore fundamentally inherent in the psyche or spirit of human beings ------- or at least once was in a far stronger stand against it than the current political trends indicate. Thus: To stand outside that ‘inherent compass’ means exactly that, to stand estranged from what should be!
Let’s once more note the fact that the ‘entertainment industry’ has fed into this darker aspect of the human psyche. Horror movies that feature scenes depicting the torture of women and children give ‘fresh ideas’ to the ‘evil’ in society, by unwittingly promoting and inflaming them to commit these kinds of horrendous crimes against real victims. Yet we must surely question the script-writers who produce the screenplay, for therein stands the reality of how twisted and dark thought forms can translate into horrendous crimes. The human world is truly a very sick place!
In the Christian and Judaic worlds, at least, what we have ‘illuminated’ about this SECTION should set right how it is Divinely-Ordained to be. Yet the world of the human race today says differently! How foolish!
ISLAMIC BELIEFS
The Muslim “religion” has traditionally been less tolerant of “anything-goes sexual freedoms” than the more liberal and decadent West. Though that is a broad generalisation, nonetheless the core-essence of Islam is far stricter in this area. However, as we noted earlier on, notwithstanding that reality, Islamic bath-houses from the 12th century, recently discovered in long-abandoned desert areas, feature frescoes of naked women and men in various intimate positions. In any case, some Islamic rulers and Caliphs possessed harems of women numbering as much as many hundreds. How decadent is that?
What is probably a sure given is that the religion of Islam condemns the practice of homosexuality and lesbianism --- and all other kinds of aberrant sexual behaviour! We unequivocally applaud that “stand”! M.M. Ali’s Koran, Chapter 4, Section 4 --- ‘What Women may be taken in Marriage’ --- verse 23 gives us a clear insight into this aspect of Islamic Law.
Forbidden to you are your mothers, and your daughters, and your sisters, and your paternal aunts, and brother’s daughters and sister’s daughters, and your mothers that have suckled you, and your foster-sisters, and mothers of your wives, and your stepdaughters who are in your guardianship (born) of your wives to whom you have gone in --- but if you have not gone into them, there is no blame on you --- and the wives of your sons who are of your own loins; and that you should have two sisters together, except what has already passed. Surely Allah is ever-Forgiving, Merciful.a
M.M. Ali’s commentary on this verse is very succinct, and, in this case on this subject, is in complete accord with the Bible i.e. 23 a. ‘For prohibited marriage relations in the Mosaic law see Lev. 18:16-18’. The Book of Leviticus thus offers us a broad spectrum of Laws for correct earthly life. Interestingly, the various addresses therein are directed primarily to men!
Reader: even though we still have some way to go, we are nonetheless about burned out on the subject matter here, for the dark and base nature of the increasing aspiritual garbage that ostensibly poses as wonderful liberation from foolish and unnecessary “societal/religious constraints” --- as already expressed more than once or twice --- sickens one’s soul and spirit!
Thankfully throughout, however, we have had exactly the right Words of Divine Power to help unburden ourselves. At this brief pause, let us therefore give grateful thanks to Almighty God for our Eternal Mediator and the immeasurable Grace of Divine Truth!
Notwithstanding the fact that we have yet more garbage to deal with, assess and “Correct” in a few more Discourses before we are finally free of this Mission; since in this case we are targeting the Western world primarily, let us close with a short but very relevant Text from W.H. Canaway’s: ‘The Helmet and the Cross’.
“The West: Take the money and run. Do as thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. And the drugs internationals and the gambling internationals; environmental destruction in the name of progress; the sexual morality of the mole-rat with attendant plagues; the weapons of mass murder. And only a few men and women had paused to consider that certain behaviour patterns might be wrong.”
MODERN MARRIAGE: --- WESTERN SOCIAL CUSTOMS
Reader: We will end this obviously contentious Discourse with more contention for primarily Western societies by looking at the institution of “marriage”. Spoken of in poetry and prose as the crowning of the love between a man and a woman; the legal seal to the marriage is the consummation. In the standard Christian wedding ceremony, the officiating Celebrant asks the bride and groom in turn if they will promise to honour each other in “body and soul”. Naturally, both will say yes.
Prior to that, however, the social aspect of “modern marriages” will have seen the previous night’s revelry in the form of a “hen party” for the bride, and a ‘stag party” for the groom, often featuring a “girlie show” for his “last night of freedom”. After the next day’s ceremony and the “sacred” vows --- with the bride usually dressed in white to ostensibly symbolise “purity” --- the newly married couple head off to ‘consummate” their “special” day. In this day and age of “liberated sexuality”, that consummation for probably most newly married couples is often just a re-run of many previous episodes in “getting to know each other better”.
Notwithstanding the modern, liberated mores of Western society, we are certainly not saying that genuine and truly harmonious love between a man and a woman cannot or should not exist outside of marriage. That is a personal choice. We are simply pointing out the rather hypocritical practices that inevitably accompanies the “special day”.
CONSUMMATION
Reader: We have looked at many aspects of human sexual interaction in all its many permutations. And we have looked at this interesting word called “love” in its present interpretation where “anything goes”. From a future point, 21st century global societies will probably be looked back on as the most aberrant era ever in human history. [That is why those same societies are already even now in the throes of imminent destruction!]
The emergence and subsequent global, social, and political entrenchment of Human Rights/My Rights now permeating every facet of ‘earth life’, carries as its new companion the hard-edged demand that ‘consummation’ between human beings is allowed to be whatever any two people decide they want it to be. Today sanctioned as not only O.K. in most societies, but in some cases actively encouraged to be exactly that anything anyone wants it to be. That is the aberrant human take on what should be a most special act.
Of course, as Divine Creation-Law states: “The free will of human spirits is never taken from them.” However: “Only the decision is free, the consequences are not!”
We have well-learned all of this in previous Discourses! Therefore, if we really have recognised the sheer immutability of the outworking of The Law, then we will be under no silly illusions about what must inevitably follow, that all transgressions against them will eventually bring the commensurate reciprocity!
Unfortunately, the widespread disbelief of probably billions of humans that there is no such connecting correlation --- or at least not one that can be readily seen in the moment --- means that, to all intents and purposes for that very large, ignorant group, there is no ‘law against it’! Therefore, religious, political, and social approval and approbation, on the surface, have ‘won the day’.
However, whether we believe it or not, or whether we even like it or not, the physical human body --- through which we do the things we do on earth, and therewith experience the sensations of touch and feel etc. --- is just the “last body’ of the different kinds of bodies that make up our complete profile. That is the real and fully complete you and me! This we also already know.
Therefore, for the purposes of the current explanation, a reminder that when we die we vacate the physical shell and stand free of it. Then, if we have not expiated especially serious transgressions committed in the immediate past earth life, they remain attached and follow us to the next Plane. There, we are forced by Law to live through and thus “work them out” to their complete severance! Not a simple “walk in the park” by any means, people!
Now: In terms of the act of “Consummation” as relating to the “first time” in any given relationship, from then on, each act of intimacy can be viewed as a kind of renewal of the first. Most will therefore see it as being able to express love for each other, often.
LOVE: Is that not the true key here?
Now reader: Despite the fact that the Bible of the two billion Christians in all their denominations states very bluntly what is the “right way” according to The Will and Perfect Laws of God, most Christian Churches --- and by extension and direct association, the leaders of them all --- by their sanctioning and approbation of transgressive Sodom and Gomorrhic human behaviour against those Holy Laws of God, actually reject what are essentially Divine Commands!
The obvious question is Why? For if you say you really believe in your Bible, good Christians, why then do so many of you sanction such non-God-Willed transgressions so insistently? Why not be completely honest, reject your Bible, and simply walk away?
But no, just “cherry-pick” what suits, continue to very wrongly believe that “He died for your rotten sins”, and therefore be saved from your ongoing “aberrant stuff”.-------- Hypocrites!
Christian Church leaders and you billions of the Apostle Paul’s “man-followers”, understand that most of you are already not “the few” that will surmount the Judgement clearly now upon us!
In the final analysis, “physical consummation” between two human beings can only have true God-Willed sanctioning in that which takes place between a man and a woman where, quite obviously, the sexual organs of reproduction and consummatory intimacy are perfectly designed to accommodate and enhance what was always ordained to be the special nature of human love on earth!
And if entered into with true love for each other, then if there is even the smallest degree of spiritual awareness, gratitude should well up for that especial gift.
But let’s not pass judgement here; let’s instead hear how it is supposed to be according to Divine Creation-Law!
From The Hand of Imanuel, The Son of Man:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
MARRIAGE
IMANUEL/ABD-RU-SHIN:
“SON OF MAN”
And “ETERNAL MEDIATOR”!
FOOTNOTE:
We have now read “how it is supposed to be”; indeed, how it was “always supposed to be”! Today, especially, that is clearly not the case. For in just 2020 alone --- never mind what has gone before --- over the period of “Lockdown” due to the Coronavirus “Pestilence” and brought into sharp focus, was the state of “marriage” and partnerships in many Western countries. The resultant close proximity of “families” unable to leave homes and apartments for weeks on end brought about a huge increase in marital violence, psychological problems, and depression.
The French government, for one, took over large hotels in Paris to house “battered wives” and their children to protect them from violent husbands. Those “marriages” were, very obviously, “not made in heaven”!
Also, clearly “not made in heaven” are the terrible situations where women in the now many war-torn regions of earth ruled by sadistic war-lords and their equally brutal “gun thugs” are often subject to a life of sexual slavery. The resultant end-outcome for them is, unfortunately, probably an earlier death than might otherwise have ordinarily been the case.
At the very close of this Discourse, the nature of the Text we have just read describing the violation of what should be a sacred union between a man and a woman needs to be seriously understood as exactly that --- a “sacred union” between a “man and a woman”!
In the West, the “new path” of spiritually-aberrant “rainbow” LBTQVXYZ etc. “stuff” is now being travelled in all its strangeness by millions of “humans” now proud to show their “gay pride” status. The tragedy for all of them who from personal choice subscribe to and/or “live” that lifestyle, must inevitably translate --- for them if they do not in the meantime spiritually awaken to their “existence-threatening” transgression against Holy Divine Creation-Law --- to the reality of the horrendous and terrible finality of the “Second Death”!
For in that sure recognition, Inviolable Creation-Law --- as we have hammered many times --- carries the finality of Holy Divine Justice!
So: To every human on earth, you cannot do what you personally want and expect that such LAW will deliver to you “showers of roses” because you believe it should be so --- for you!
READER: If we are condemned, pilloried, and labelled as being somehow “unnatural homophobics” simply because we have recognised the Immutable, Inviolable, and thus Sacrosanct Holy Laws of The Almighty that no human being can transgress with impunity, then we stand in exactly the right place!
Convenient or politically popular laws formulated by legislators that oppose such Divine Ordination in the end simply accelerate inevitable societal collapse!
To that sure end --- and quite apart from the clear beginnings of the End-Time Prophecy of Isaiah of “few men left, and the Divine warning from Jesus, The Son of God, that “were the times not cut short, not a man would be saved” --- we also now have a far stronger warning from The Son of Man: That by all our aberrant behaviour for thousands of years, and now culminating in the global “rainbow movement”, we have created an earthly society that He, as also being The Very Will of God --- in His Words of Final Justice, has Judged as a latter-day “Sodom and Gomorrah”!
And because we will not change our ways, therein lies the end fate for the greater bulk of the human race --- already begun in earnest.
Reader: in the next Section, the Catholic Church, in their over a millennium of serious and still ongoing transgressions against this very Divine Ordinance, come under the keen microscope of the True Laws of God, as given to us by Imanuel, The Son of Man!