THE BOOK
PART IV B
THE TRUE WORDS OF MOHAMMED :
WRITTEN FOR ETERNITY ON CREATION’S
“BOOK OF LIFE”!
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- AN ESPECIAL NOTE:
- 36) THE QUR’AN TODAY:
WORD OF GOD, WORD OF MUHAMMAD,
OR WORD OF “LONG-SPLINTERED” ISLAM? - 37) ISLAM’S SELF-DESTRUCTIVE ‘SEED’
THE DEMISE OF ISLAM:
A PROPHECY BY MUHAMMAD - 38) PROBLEM “TENETS” OF THE MUSLIM FAITH:
NO MIRACLES ACCOMPANIED HIS BIRTH.
DID NOT CAST A SHADOW.
COULD NOT READ OR WRITE - 39) MOHAMMED’S RECOGNITION OF JESUS:
A BRUTAL “REVELATION” FOR ISLAM! - 40) MOHAMMED’S JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM: ---
A NATURAL HAPPENING! - 41) MOHAMMED’S PROCLAMATION OF THE
“TWO SONS” OF GOD AND THE “TRINITY”! - 42) ALI’S “FIERCE AND WELL-TRAINED” ARMY ---
GIFTS IN PARADISE? - 43) MOHAMMED PROCLAIMS THE “SON OF MAN”: ---
THE ACTUAL “SPIRIT OF TRUTH” --- TO MUSLIM ARABIA! - 44) THE “SPLIT” IN ISLAM --- EVEN BEFORE THE PROPHET’S DEATH:
THE BATTLE FOR “SUCCESSORSHIP” IN HIS “EARTHLY” FAMILY ~ ~ - 45) THE “FINAL” WORDS TO THE PROPHET, MOHAMMED:
MOHAMMED’S “FINAL” WORDS TO THE PEOPLE! - 46) THE TRAGIC AND “UNPARDONABLE” AFTERMATH!
NOT THE “FINAL RELIGION” FOR “THE WORLD”
PART IV B
AN ESPECIAL NOTE:
Reader: Just as with the First Section, the key content for most of the Discourses of this PART IV B is also sourced from the Akashic Record --- Creation’s “Book of Life”! The first two Discourses are not so sourced, however, but are nonetheless essential for the overall flow of this final PART of the complete Work, so are included.
As you are well aware, the Title and subject matter of this whole tome is about Monotheism’s claim to Ownership of The “Spirit of Truth”, Whose true identity has been comprehensively revealed to you
For what you must never forget is that we are Proclaiming The All-Truth of Imanuel --- He Who is the real Spirit of Truth, the actual Son of Man --- and the reality of the Akashic Record is exactly that!
Taking both those facts into account, this PART IV B, will marry that DIVINE TRUTH to the Words that Mohammed spoke some 1,400 years ago. Because the authenticity of the Akashic Chronicle as the Book of Life can no longer be denied by rank-and-file human beings on earth, the key Proclamatory Declarations by Mohammed that you will have noted in the above Table of Contents, will be illuminated in their own Discourses, of which some may therefore be quite brief, but nonetheless fundamentally impactful!
In essential reinforcement: You will already have noted Imanuel’s explanation of the Akashic Record as being The Book of Life! However, in terms of these particular Discourses and their critical subject matter for Islam, you may want to re-familiarise yourself with what that Akashic Chronicle really is.
To help you once more: Let’s reacquaint ourselves with what should have been global humanity’s key and beneficial recognition --- the step-by-step spiritual-evolutionary journey wrought by the great Truth-bringers. Unfortunately, under the ignorance of “the followers”, their pristine teachings quite quickly became just “distorted religions”. The story of Mohammed’s life and mission ------ as it truly was ------ is recorded in one of a number of books known as the Truth-Bringer Series!
His mission, too, suffered the same fate as all the others, despite the strident clamour to the contrary that Islam so desperately promotes today!
So: Reader; once more note that the “Truth-Bringer” and “Past Eras Awaken” series revealing the true history of our past, was not written by The Spirit of Truth Himself. A few selected human beings, precisely “Called for the purpose”, were given the ability to “see” and “hear” the events of the past and thus record them in written form --- as is the case now with the life of Mohammed. However, that ability was only possible while they were in Imanuel’s proximity. For that reason, the names of the authors --- or “seers” --- are not stated.
In terms of “Past Era’s” Awakening so that global humanity might be led into the true knowledge of its past, the Publisher’s Foreword once more explains what should have been!
PAST ERAS AWAKEN
‘This Volume is one of the book-series entitled “Past Eras Awaken”. In it are shown the direct helps and the spiritual guidance from the Light given to mankind from their early beginnings. The explanations embrace happenings both on earth and in the beyond. ...
The origin of the writings is certainly unusual according to the present way of thinking. The contents of the books are “received”, not thought out. To grasp this, it must be recognised that in Creation nothing is lost, that every living happening remains indelibly preserved. ...
What is received always follows specific threads in the development of events. For each of the receiving persons they are of a different kind. Therefore some of the same events are illumined from various aspects; while one description may view and report from the spiritual standpoint, thus seen from above downwards, another gives the same from the earthly point of view.
Every unprejudiced reader can experience within himself the rightness of what is offered. He will sense that it was not fantasy that guided the pen, but a genuine happening, evoked from mists of antiquity. Amazed, perhaps deeply moved, he will be able to perceive how the veils are lifted from a great decisive past, whereby he can attain to spiritual far-sight, and to recognition of the connections right up to the closing of the cycle at the present time.
All the beyond earthly happenings described in the aforesaid book-series are completely substantiated by the Work “In the Light of Truth”, in accordance with the Laws of Creation.
The differences of opinion about the teaching and work of the well-known prophets, even about the Word of Truth brought by Jesus the Son of God, call for special comment: no reader need fear that he will become involved in the dissension of the various religious creeds.
In the way in which the teachings were once given by these wise men --- beginning with Hjalfdar (the book “Ephesus”), to Krishna, Zoroaster, Lao-Tse, Moses and the Prophets, Buddha and Mohammed, and some others besides --- lies a clear, uniform course of spiritual guidance from the Light for mankind on earth.”
Abd-ru-shin, author of The Grail Message, writes about this in a bequest:
“If in the course of thousands of years men had not always acted as they still do today, if they had not time and time again distorted everything that was intended to help them, in order to adapt it to their earthly way of thinking and their earthly desires, there would now be only one uniform teaching here on earth, issuing from the Will of God. There would not be so many kinds of denominations.
“All the teachings that have come to earth in the past would, united, form a single flight of steps to the pedestal on which the Truth is to stand, as has so often been proclaimed to mankind in various promises.
“There would be no differences in the interpretations, much less differences in the teachings themselves!
“For all teachings were at one time willed by God, precisely adapted to the individual peoples and countries, and formed in complete accord with their actual spiritual maturity and receptivity.
“...The bringers of all the individual teachings were Forerunners of the Word of Truth Itself.”
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
There you have it once more: “...the pedestal on which the Truth is to stand”. Note: Not has stood, but “is to stand”.
In direct concert with the above, that reality is forever predicated on the unassailable fact that Truth can only stand on the very Pedestal of Truth!
For sceptical science and perhaps the doubting majority of the present-day human race who would demand some kind of “proof” that does not include “flaky spiritualism” or New Age “stuff” etc.; well, in Discourse 10, PART II, you have the benefit of 21st century, cutting-edge science to quell your disbelief. And therein, therefore, exists Truth!
For, in truth, any attempt to produce a religious/historical narrative that revealed the true picture of what we now know as the Light-directed, step-by-step, journey of the Truth-Bringers, would simply not be valid or credible. However, with science’s recognition that such a “Record” must really exist, what we see ---- again ---- is one more, in this case, very strong example of earth-science finally catching up with ancient and correct “spiritual knowledge”.
That means we can proceed with both those elements of Authority for what we will now begin to reveal about the life and mission of Mohammed.
DISCOURSE 36
THE QUR’AN TODAY:
WORD OF GOD? WORD OF MUHAMMAD?
OR WORD OF “LONG-SPLINTERED” ISLAM?
MOHAMMED.
Born 22 April 571 AD Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
Died: 8th June 632 AD, Medina Saudi Arabia.
Quotes:
Kindness is a mark of faith, and whoever has not kindness has not faith.
None of you truly believes until he wishes for his brother what he wishes
for himself.
Four things support the world; the learning of the wise, the justice of the
great, the prayers of the good, and the valour of the brave.
Notwithstanding all that you have read so far in terms of what we have revealed time and again in pointing out the sheer illogical nature of both verse and commentary in the Koran; in this final stretch of these last Discourses, we deem it absolutely appropriate to hammer that “Koranic reality” to its farthest point.
To that end: For this Discourse and its contentious heading, we will give you two things to consider. The first consists of a number of excerpts taken from the “Introductory” pages of the Koran of our renowned scholar of Islam, Maulana Muhammad Ali.
At this stage of the Work, reader, you will certainly be very familiar with M.M. Ali’s “Koran” and his extensive commentary. You will also be well-accustomed to my refutation of most of Ali’s Islamic/academic interpretation of Koranic verse through the application of just sheer, simple logic. Thankfully, I have the supreme benefit of access to The Grail Message ----- The All-Truth of the real Spirit of Truth!
What is striking about M.M. Ali’s Qur’an is the very high esteem in which it is held by Muslim commentators. Not so strange one might think; yet in the two introductory pieces by eminent Koranic scholars in their own right, the same truly illogical theme of a serious disconnect between the historical beginnings of the complete work and the present-day interpretation of how it came to be is there once again. It’s all akin to an M.A.S. --- a “mutual admiration society”. Logic, common sense, and continuity seem not to matter, as long as the Letter of Islamic Law is pushed to the fore.
Well, reader: In order to illuminate exactly that point we will, one section at a time, hammer home the glaring inconsistencies that global Islam simply and blindly “refuses to see”! With each Section, we will point out those very inconsistencies.
The second contribution is an online article exactly commensurate with the title of this Discourse! It appears to be written as part of what is referred to as a Mukto-mona (Collection) --- but with little else to fully identify the authors.
However, the content of it is such that it fairly screams logic and truth. For this Work, the primary consideration for any inclusion is not so much the source, but the content, and whether it is relevant to our purpose --- and that essay certainly is.
Right, let us go straight to the Foreword in M.M. Ali’s Koran. That particular contribution comes from two Muslim scholars:
Dr. Saeed Ahmad Khan
President, Ahmadiyya Anjuman Lahore, Pakistan ---- and;
N.A. Faruqui
Vice-President, Ahmadiyya Anjuman Lahore, Pakistan
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Foreword
‘The English Translation of the Holy Qur’an with Commentary, by Maulana
Muhammad Ali (d. 1951), has been highly acclaimed all over the world, ever since
the first edition appeared in 1951, and holds the position of a renowned classic of
religious literature. It was the first English translation by a Muslim to be generally
available and to be made accessible to the West, printed as it was in England. Its
publication was all the more remarkable as it took place at a time when there was
a grossly distorted, misconceived and dark image of Islam generally prevalent,
making the atmosphere extremely hostile to this sublime faith and to prospects of
its progress.
Besides being a pioneer work, there are several other important respects
in which the Translation and Commentary holds an outstanding and unrivalled
position. Two may be noted here. Firstly, it presents the faith of Islam in its pure
and pristine form by treating the Qur’an itself as the direct supreme authority, (*)
rather than approaching it through the medium of later interpretations. It thus
corrects the deep-seated and widely-held misconceptions about Islamic
teachings, and shows Islam to be an entirely peaceful and tolerant religion, a faith
which seeks to convince and not to coerce, (**) and one which is concerned not
only with outward forms but with the inner spirit as well. Secondly, this work has
had an incalculable influence in drawing non-Muslims towards Islam, as well as
rescuing Muslims themselves from doubt and disillusionment, as evidenced the
wealth of glowing tributes which have been paid to it.’
(*) The statement, “direct supreme authority”, we hope for Islam’s sake means ‘for the religion’ and not for any kind of ‘final Divine Truth’; for it is not and could not ever be! But we have clearly refuted such a notion many times over.
(**) ‘...an entirely peaceful and tolerant religion, a faith which seeks to convince and not to coerce’? History tells us that what is referred to as the “Golden Age of Islam” was exactly that, but we doubt that the 21st century citizens of earth in the countries that have been subjected to murderous jihadist attacks by rabid Muslims would ever agree with that declaration. Now:
From the Foreword to the 1963 Edition
by Maulana Muhammad Yakub Khan
‘Maulana Muhammad Ali’s Translation marks a definite epoch in the understanding of Islam. Among the Muslim intelligentsia it positively arrested the creeping decay of faith as a result of Western materialistic influences, and the sceptical trends of Western philosophic thought. Typical of this reaction of the Muslim mind was the fulsome acknowledgement by a well-known devout Muslim thinker and writer, referred to by the author in the Preface, who ascribes his own rescue from the wilderness of atheism to this Translation. .......
Interpreting the Word of God (*) calls for great gifts of scholarship, no doubt, but it requires something much more, which no scholarship can confer --- the gift of inner purity. Maulana Muhammad Ali wielded a scholar’s pen with a saint’s hands, and that is where lay the secret of this Translation becoming a real force and a beacon of light for seekers-after-truth. (**) By the very cast of his mind, Maulana Muhammad Ali was deeply religious. Having obtained three university degrees, when the prospects of a bright worldly career lay at his feet, he dedicated his life to the service of Islam. And what a dedication! He took up his pen in that cause in 1902 as a young man in his twenties, wielded it incessantly, untiringly and devotedly for half a century, and did not lay it down until it was actually snatched from him by the hand of death.’
(*) Now; reader: Here’s the nub of our first asterisked point. ‘Interpreting the Word of God’ means that in the very first instance one must have The Word of God to begin with in order for one to recognise IT as such! Secondly, if one truly does have the actual Word of God, then it will certainly not need any “religious human beings” to interpret IT! That is a very foolish notion, indeed.
(**) A clear reality with this second point is that if we truly are ‘seekers-after–truth’, then we will want to at least know how to recognise God! To hammer these two critical points home, we will once more show you why we humans of the lowest level in Creation need constant and deserving, seriously-admonishing words. To that necessary and beneficial end; from The Hand of Imanuel:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
THE RECOGNITION OF GOD
This, however, does not come overnight, nor does it fall to him in his sleep, but it requires earnest efforts, a great and strong volition, which must not lack in purity.
You human beings have had the unquenched longing for the recognition of God bestowed upon you. It is so implanted within you that you cannot find peace during your wanderings through Subsequent Creation, which you are permitted to undertake for the purpose of your development, so that in becoming self-conscious you learn gratefully to enjoy the blessings which the worlds hold for you and offer to you. ---------
Now at last, men, seek the recognition of your God in Creation, of which you are the smallest part of that species which is allowed to develop to self-consciousness through the Grace of the Creator, in fulfilment of the longing that lies within it!
Do not merely seek to satisfy your vanity in this matter, as you have hitherto done through being the slave of your intellect! You have come to an end of this! You and your imagined abilities are about to collapse! And you are very far from real ability! ------
The believers! All you who count yourselves among the believers in God, just examine yourselves to ascertain whether the belief you carry within yourselves is really the right one! By that I do not mean the form your belief takes, whether Catholic, Protestant, Buddhist or Mohammedan, or any other form, but I mean the nature of your belief, to what extent it is living! -----------
Question your fellow-man about the irrevocable Laws of God in Creation! If he cannot give you the right answer he is nothing but a hypocrite, who deceives himself when he talks of the recognition of God and of the right faith in God!
For in accordance with the unswerving Laws of God he cannot possess it, because in no other way can he ever attain it.
Everything in Creation strides forward uniformly without interruption in accordance with an immovable law! It is only you human beings who still do not go along owing to your delusion, your ridiculous conceited knowledge, which is lacking in humble observation! -------------
Abd-ru-shin: “SON OF MAN”
And “ETERNAL MEDIATOR”!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“Question your fellow-man about the irrevocable Laws of God in
Creation! If he cannot give you the right answer he is nothing but a
hypocrite, who deceives himself when he talks of the recognition of God
and of the right faith in God!
For in accordance with the unswerving Laws of God he cannot
possess it, because in no other way can he ever attain it.”
There in just those few words of The Son of Man is one of the prime reasons for the whole of our long and religious, blood-soaked history! We most certainly deceive ourselves! Let us read a little more from M.M. Al’s devoted peers:
‘Work on the first edition of the English translation of the Qur’an took him
seven long years (1909 — 1916). The amount of original research that went into
tracing the meanings of the words and verses, finding the underlying sense of
Sections and Chapters, and linking it up with the preceding and succeeding text,
so that the whole of the Qur’an was shown to have the thread of a continuous
theme running through it --- it is simply staggering to think of all this stupendous
and most taxing labour put in single handed, day after day, for seven long years.
But that is exactly what made Maulana Muhammad Ali’s translation the boon of
the world of scholarship in the West as well as the East when it appeared in print
in 1917. It was a pioneer venture breaking altogether new ground, and the
pattern set was followed by all subsequent translations of the Qur’an by Muslims.
It meets every criticism that has been levelled against the Qur’an. (*) The
Introduction is a whole mine of research, which throws light on all the salient
features of a truly Divine religion. (*) There is no attempt at pedantry or literary
flourishes. Nor is there any pandering to preconceived notions or a bid for cheap
popularity. It is a loyal service to the Word of God (*) aiming at scrupulously
honest, faithful rendering.’
About the closing years of his life, when the Translation had already run
into three editions, and the Maulana was stepping into his seventies, he felt he
owed it to the world to give it the fruit of his deeper insight into the Quranic
truths, (*) which more extensive study in the meantime, and advancing long
years, had brought him. Once more he plunged himself into another long spell of
the most taxing labour to bring out a revised edition. This took him another five
years (1946 – 1951). He forgot that he was no longer a young man. The strain
proved too much for him, so that he had to do the proof-reading in his sick-bed,
which proved to be his death-bed. .......................
The final proofs were corrected on October 8, 1951, and five days later he
breathed his last. He dies in harness in service to the Qur’an.
The Qur’an describes the battle for the minds of men as the highest jihad.
Maulana Muhammad Ali was undoubtedly the greatest mujahid of his day in the
cause of the Qur’an.’
(*) ‘meets every criticism that has been levelled against the Qur’an’. --- ‘a truly Divine religion’. --- ‘the Word of God’, --- ‘deeper insight into the Quranic truths’”.
Strong words, indeed! Dedication to a cause truly believed in is something that certainly deserves respect. However, if that whole lifetime of dedication results in the completion of a mission that actually does not produce what the author and/or his peers and admirers believed he was achieving, then the produced work must then stand completely isolated from the Living Force of Divine Truth that runs through, maintains and sustains, all of Creation. Thus, in the end, a work suited solely to just one of the many religions of man.
As a simple example, let us reproduce from The Foundational Text --- GOD, THE EVER-LIVING --- just a part of M.M. Ali’s version of the birth of Jesus. You read the complete version there at the beginnings of this Work precisely to show from the very outset the impossible and illogical nature of just one of a number of key tenets/beliefs of Islam and its over 1.5 billion “unthinking followers”! So from M.M. Ali’s Koran:
M.M. Ali, in commentary 21 b; observes:
‘She conceived him in the ordinary way in which women conceive
children’.
And in commentary on 19 a:
‘The words I will give thee a pure boy are the words of the message. The
Spirit, in fact, only conveyed the Divine message, as it always does. Every
word of the Holy Qur’-an is the word of God, but every word was
delivered to the Prophet by the angel.’
Reader: Close to the end of this extensive Work, we necessarily repeat what you have just read i.e., ------
Every word of the Holy Qur’-an is the word of God. -----
So: Either Gabriel delivered the ‘word/s’ of God absolutely verbatim --- or he gave his own version! An Archangel appointed by God to deliver His Words to a Prophet also appointed by Him so that a whole people could be freed from tribal bondage to superstition and wrong practices, is hardly going to distort such Divine Messages. Unlike us human beings, the High Servants of God truly live the meaning, form and concept of Service to God!
Yet, in the musings of Islamic commentators, what was ostensibly given from the Archangel Gabriel to Muhammad --- from presumably out of immediate “Divine” connection in instant real-time --- is nonetheless still permitted by the religion to be analysed and commented on to determine its true meaning. Global Islam, by your very own supposedly sacrosanct beliefs, do you not see how these kinds of academic/intellectual analyses --- for in the end that is all they are --- simply cannot be possible!
For in the next part of this “Ali rendition” on the Birth of Jesus in the Sura, Mary; the much-respected Islamic scholar is completely oblivious to the clear reality that the very Verses of the Koran tell an “impossible story”! Let us now first read the actual verses, and then from just simple scientific and medical logic, analyse what both the Koran and M.M. Ali are actually saying!
So she conceived Him and withdrew to a place far off. (3)
And the pangs of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a date palm. (3)
She said, “Would that I had died before this and was a thing forgotten,
utterly forgotten!”
So he (Gabriel) (4) called out to her from below her, (4) “Grieve not!
Thy Lord has placed a rivulet beneath thee. And shake toward thyself the
trunk of the date palm; (5) fresh, ripe dates shall fall upon thee. So eat
and drink and cool thine eye.
That is what the Koran says. Now, reader; here is my very logical analysis of both the Koranic verses, but primarily M.M. Ali’s interpretation of this “story”.
(3) Now, in the throes of childbirth --- completely alone, remember --- Mary is driven to the base of a date palm. She is thirsty and in need of sustenance. What happens next is so bizarre and ludicrous that it beggars disbelief as to why it has never been seriously questioned by Islamic “scholars”. Let’s explain!
Firstly Mary is under the guardianship of the archangel, Gabriel. He is not one of the many lesser serving angels of God, but one of the seven Highest Archangels. He is a Proclaimer of Divine Messages, yet he somehow ends up “in the ground”! (4) According to A. Yusuf Ali’s interpretation; for the purpose of simply telling Mary that there is a “rivulet flowing beneath her” --- which she would surely see in any case ---- and from which she can assuage her thirst. Gabriel, the Lord’s great Messenger, is there reduced to being “a voice from beneath the palm tree”. (4)
So this very special Messenger of God is relegated by Islam to some kind of lesser creature that can somehow transition to a place under a date palm (4), just to give advice to Mary. How strange is that? Is that not truly more than just ludicrous? No “Message from God”, even delivered by His Messenger, would ever be heard from below the ground. The sheer effrontery of Islam here is truly staggering!
(5) Then; to assuage her hunger, Gabriel advises Mary --- who is sitting at the base of the palm tree and surely weakened through giving birth --- to reach out and, at its base, mind; “shake the trunk of the palm tree” so that ripe dates will fall from it.
Think about that, reader! Who on this earth would have the strength to shake the trunk of a fully-matured date palm --- at its base --- sufficiently-vigorously to loosen its fruit? Even icon “Arnie” (Arnold Schwarzenegger) in his prime would be hard-pressed to do so. The great Samson perhaps could have, but not a woman weak from childbirth. An impossible interpretation; unworkable in the extreme!
Despite Ali’s erudition and scholarly style in his Koran: How can over a billion and a half of the world’s population accept what is little more than “religious rhetoric” dressed up in fancy English prose that most English translations of the Koran indulge in?
To remind you of what is really at stake here --- the separation of the non-truth of men from The Divine Truth of God --- and how to embrace the latter: Muslim reader especially, in this major SECTION about Mohammed, expunge the word, comparison, from your thought-processes, and replace it, supplant it, with the concept and thus “form” of the word ------- CORRECTION!
For, in serious reinforcement once more, that is what we are “Mandated” to do: CORRECT the terrible religious errors that have denigrated and denied the wondrous reality of the TRUTH of GOD and HIS PERFECT LAWS --- and thus HIS PERFECT CREATION. And that can only be achieved with the knowledge of The All-Truth of The Spirit of Truth!
Be seriously advised, therefore: The too-long “era” of human desecration of DIVINE TRUTH is at an end!
So only with that necessary change in your thought-processes i.e., from comparison to CORRECTION; will you have the “right picture” of what this Work offers you --- and, of course, all of global humanity should they so choose! Reader: May that be so for you!
Bearing all that in mind, let’s now hear from our second contributor, who, by his admission, was once a “believing” Muslim. We will let the text speak for itself, here reproduced verbatim:
Quran --- Word of God or Muhammad?
Mukto-mona (Collection)
This article is mainly focussed to show that when we read some of the verses in the Quran, we clearly understand that those were Muhammad’s own word, not Allah’s.
According to the Muslims the Quran contains the words of God. Quran is to be read as if God Himself had spoken these words stated in it. It is important to emphasise this point because if Quran is the word of God then it should not contain any errors and it should hold true for all times. However, such is not the case.
Here we will see how some of the content of the verses in the Quran clearly shows that these words were obviously spoken by Muhammad and Not God.
Let’s start with the opening Sura of Quran.
The Opening Sura Fatihah:
(Quran 1:1-7)
In the name of the Merciful and Compassionate God.
Praise belongs to God,
The Lord of the worlds, the merciful, the
compassionate, the ruler of the day of judgement!
Thee we serve and Thee
We ask for aid. Guide us in the right path,
The path of those Thou art gracious to;
not to those Thou art wroth with, nor of
those who err.
Someone need not be a rocket-scientist to comprehend that these words are clearly addressed to God, in the form of a prayer. They are Muhammad’s words of praise to God (“Guide us in the right path, ...” ~ 001.006), asking for God’s help and guidance.
Some Muslim compilers conveniently add the imperative “say” in the English translation of the Quran at the beginning of the Sura to remove this difficulty. This imperative form of the word “say” occurs at least 350 times in the Quran, and it’s obvious that this word has, in fact, been inserted by later compilers of the Quran to remove countless similarly embarrassing difficulties. Thus, we have direct evidence that the Quran starts out with the words of Muhammad.
Let us see some other examples in Quran:
(Quran 113:1)
I take refuge with the Lord of the Dawn.
One can clearly see, it’s Muhammad and NOT GOD HIMSELF who is seeking refuge in God.
Quran 6:104)
Now have come to you from your Lord, proofs
(To open your eyes): If you will see, it will
Be for (the good of) his own soul; If any will
Be blind, it will be to his own (harm): I am not
(here) to watch over your doings.
In this verse the speaker of the line “I am not to watch over your doings” – is clearly Muhammad. In fact Dawood in his translation adds a footnote that the “I” refers to Muhammad here. And in previous verse (Quran 6:103) it is stated – ‘No mortal eyes can see Him, though He sees all eyes. He is benignant all knowing’. R Bell said in his “A commentary on the Quran (Manchester, England: Victoria university of Manchester, 1991) vol. 1. P. 201” – ‘The end of the verse shows that Prophet is speaking his own words’.
(Quran 27:91)
For me, I have been commanded to serve the
Lord of this city, Him Who has sanctified it
and to Whom (Belong) all things; and I am
commanded to be of those who bow in Islam to
Allah’s Will.
Again, the speaker here is clearly Muhammad who is trying to justify punishing the Meccans who were not willing to follow Muhammad’s Islamic version of God. Dawood and Pickthall both interpolate “say” at the beginning of the sentence which is lacking in the original Arabic version of the Sura.
(Quran 81:15)
So verily I call to witness the planets – that recede...
Again, here it is Muhammad and NOT God who is swearing by the turning planets.
Quran 84:16-19)
I swear by the afterglow of sunset, and by the night, and by the moon
when she is at the full.
Once again it is Muhammad and NOT God, He is unable to disguise his pagan heritage. (Omnipotent Allah should not swear, right?) Muhammad swears again in the name of the Sun and Moon, both of which were considered as holy deities by pre-Islamic Arabs. (Dear Readers, have you noticed that YUSUF ALI cleverly escaped the word “swear” while making the translation, But PICKTHALL and SHAKIR used it).
(Quran 6:114)
Should I seek other judge than God, when
It is He who has sent down to you, the
distinguishing book (Quran)?
Any sane person can comprehend that those words are not spoken by God but Mohammed himself. Yusuf Ali in his translation adds at the beginning of the sentence “say”, which is not there in the original Arabic and he does so without comment or footnote.
Do we need to give any further evidence that Quran actually contains the words of Muhammad, not Allah! Interested readers may also check sura 19:9, 19:64, 37:164-166, 51:50, 53:2, 70:40-41, 86:17 to understand that those can be uttered by anybody but Allah.
Reading the above passages, researchers R. Bell and W.M. Watt who were more sympathetic towards Islam admitted:
The assumption that God himself is the speaker in every passage, however, leads to difficulties. Frequently God is referred to in third person. It is no doubt allowable for a speaker to refer to himself in third person occasionally, but the extent to which we find the Prophet apparently being addressed and told about God as a third person is unusual. It is in fact been made a matter [of] ridicule that in the Quran God is made to swear by himself.’
Also Suyuti, one of the great Muslim philologist and commentator on Quran was able to point to five passages whose attribution to God was disputable. Indeed he admitted that some of the words in some verses were obviously spoken by Muhammad himself and some by Gabriel. Ali Dashti, in his famous book, ’23 tears: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Mohammad’ also points to several passages from Quran where the speaker cannot have ben God.
References:
Ibn Warraq, Why I am not a Muslim, Prometheus Books, 2003
Well; Reader: What you have just read simply reinforces everything we have said. The primary aspect of the above contribution essentially says the same; how a revered, religious book has been able to maintain a “narrative” for so long, yet is riddled with inconsistencies and impossible scenarios according to the Very Creation-Laws of God, is, literally, “impossible to understand!
Unfortunately, Islam, --- like Judaism and Christianity and all other “religions” that distort, denigrate and/or oppose the ONE PURE TRUTH now on earth --- until the very end and annihilation of most of humanity, will nonetheless to that very point continue to maintain their religious status quos and seek converts to its cause.
For the only thing that might bring the necessary awakening and drastic change prior to total collapse, will be recognition of Isaiah’s great warning to humanity.
Reader: May that Divine Fulfilment be Soon!
NOTE: Reader, but Muslim readers more especially: At this early point in this Section on the Life and Work of Muhammed, it is critical to remind you of a stark reality! It is this: If you seriously study the Koran with a completely open mind and spirit, you will come to the realisation that that work does not in any way teach the “Structure of Creation”.
It does not tell you where, at what “level” therein, the various non-physical Beings that are actually mentioned in the Koran, reside. For, just as we have a “physical home” for our conscious earthly existence, so must the “Ascending Order of the Many Servants of God” similarly have a “home of Origin and Residence”!
The clear Message from Jesus, The Son of God, affirmed that reality in the words to His disciples: “In my Father’s house are many mansions. Were it not so, I would have told you!”
The “many mansions” are very obviously not houses and apartments, nor are they planets in the galaxy that some very silly online Christian commentators opine might be the home of some of the Beings mentioned in the Bible --- they who are all “non-physical”.
We explained all of that in Discourse 20 --- The Physical Universes of Material Creation --- where you learned that the stupendous expanse of just our galaxy alone, itself completely incomprehensible to the human brain, was yet just one among seven! And that all seven comprised just the smallest and thus lowest Part of the Whole Creation!
We remind you of this because just one single gap in any narrative of how we got here, and/or what Creation is or supposed to be, means that such a gap renders the whole “story” incorrect before the Perfection of Divine Creation-Law!
Such Perfection does not, in any shape or form, reside in human renditions of that Divine Sublimity!
Nor does that necessary knowledge, in its crucially-essential detail, reside in any of the great religious books of mankind!
DISCOURSE 37
ISLAM’S SELF-DESTRUCTIVE
‘SEED’
THE DEMISE OF ISLAM
----- A PROPHECY BY MUHAMMAD -----
READER: We are now quite close to the end of this long Work, in which we have travelled a very long and wondrous path into revelation and illumination. Along the way we have necessarily revealed where “untruths” and distortions needed to be exposed and shown for what they really are. For: as we made it abundantly clear at the outset, this Work is one of Proclamation of Divine Truth!
We Proclaim Imanuel as The Other Son of God and the real Spirit of Truth!
And we Proclaim His All-Truth --- His Grail Message --- perhaps for the final time for all of global humanity! For “through HIM, all things were made”!
Now: In direct reflection of the ordained Title for this Work, this Discourse will feature concerns of Muslims about the “Religion of Islam”. What is perhaps the most telling aspect of what you will read is exactly that which we have striven to bring you throughout the Work i.e., the very awareness of how far Islam is from the real Truth of God.
In the following Discourse, from the Akashic Record you will read about Mohamed and Jesus, and you will then know who Mohammed really was at the time Jesus lived on earth. In addition you will also read how aspects of the Islamic “religion” are so far removed from both physical and spiritual reality that they defy rational thinking. A key one is the promise of 70 “virgins” in Paradise; a ploy by Mohammed’s General, Abu Bekr, to motivate his new ‘soldiers of Islam’ to fight harder. The same, silly, unworkable impossibility still drives murdering Jihadists today.
Poor deluded fools, a blatant but clever lie, and one which Mohammed rightly condemned at the time! Reader, those necessary revelations should help you to more clearly put what you will read now, into a correct context.
The key point about the following article is that it states exactly that which Mohammed lamented over for the future of Islam --- even before his death. That, too, you will shortly know!
So: Let us begin with an online article by a Mr. None Darwish, President of FormerMuslimsLimited.org. He is also the author of “The Devil We Don’t Know” and “The Dark Side of Revolutions in the Middle East”.
We may offer our commentary on his views. However, after many long pages of revealing the many errors of Islam, you, reader, probably do not need much more input from us. But we shall see! We quote his “statement” verbatim.
ISLAM’S SELF-DESTRUCTIVE SEED
A Reflection on an Eerie prophecy by Muhammed.
‘Within the DNA of Islam is a self-destructive element; a prophecy by Mohammed in which he said that Islam will eventually be rejected by the world and would return back to where it came from.sk your local imam, and he’ll tell you Mohammed doesn’t lie.
Incredibly, Mohammed himself was not optimistic about his own message and the future of Islam and Muslims’:
“[T]he Messenger of Allah (Mohammed) observed: Verily Islam started as something strange and it would again revert (to its old position) of being strange (*) just as it started, and it would recede between the two mosques just as the serpent crawls back into its hole.” [Sahih Muslim, Book 001, Number 0270.]
In this Hadith, Mohammed foretold that the end of Islam would be strange just like its beginning and that it would shrink back to the limited area where it came from ... between the two mosques of Mecca and Medina.
Could that prediction by Mohammed himself be a signal of the inevitable demise of Islam?
Mohammed’s predictions of Islam crawling back like a snake to where it came from were repeated extensively in several other hadiths.
Belief returns and goes back to Medina like a snake.”
(Sahih Bukhari, 3.30. 100.)
“Muslims will be the scum and the rubbish even though their numbers
may increase; the enemy will not fear Muslims anymore. This will be
because the Muslims will love the world and dislike death...”
(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 37.4284.)
“Muhammad’s contemporaries were the best Muslims; after three
generations, the Muslims will be mainly treacherous and untrustworthy.”
(Sahih Bukhari, 5.57.2,3.)
“There will be much killing during the last days of the Muslim.”
(Sahih Bukhari, 9.88.183.)
“Verily, Belief returns and goes back to Medina as a snake returns and
goes back to its hole (when in danger).”
(Volume 3, Book 30, Number 100: Narrated Abu Huraira.)
Mohammed also predicted a large movement of apostasy out of Islam:
“Muslims will diminish in number and they will go back to where they
started [before Islam].”
(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 2.19.3029.)
“There will be no trace of Islam in some believers...”
(Sahih Bukhari, 9.84.65.)
Could these believers, with no trace of Islam in them, be the reformers of Islam, like the well-intentioned Dr. Zudhi Jasser, who are believing in an Islam that does not and has never existed? Mohammed’s fears of large apostasy movements and envy of other religions continue:
There will appear in this nation .... A group of people so pious apparently that you will consider your prayers inferior to their prayers, but they will recite the Quran, teachings of which will not go beyond their throats and will go out of their religion as an arrow darts through the game, whereupon the archer may look at his arrow, its Nasi at its Risaf and its Fuga to see whether it is blood-stained or not (i.e. they will have not even a trace of Islam in them.’ [Volume 9, Book 84, Number 65:]
Since its inception, Islam has been at war with civilization. “Civilization” is considered a threat to Arabia’s identity and culture and with Islam it was the outside world that had to change and adapt to Arabia’s language, culture, religion.
Will Jihadists, yearning for achieving their imaginary perfect caliphate, finally realize that such a utopia never existed and will never exist? Will they eventually grasp that their enemies are not the Mubaraks, Assads, Quaddifis, America, Israel or past injustice, but in fact, their enemy is within, a terminal virus written in a 7th century incoherent legal system that still rules them today? Will Muslims from Morocco to Indonesia reject Sharia, and send it back to where it came from as their prophet predicted, to the two mosques in Mecca and Medina?
Will the world finally come to its senses, learn from the violent history of Islam, and reject it by declaring it the most evil totalitarian ideology created by man? Will the world learn that Islam is but a snake, a viper, behind the title of religion? (**) Will the leaders of the free world find the courage to unite in a march to save the world and say loud and clear, “Islam go back to Mecca, like your prophet predicted”? And then will they declare, “There is no peace for you in our part of the world, and the world we want our children to live in”?
What are Muslims waiting for to declare the truth? Will they finally admit they cannot rule any longer under the barbarian laws of Sharia that are enshrined in all Islamic constitutions? Will they ever see the day when great nations such as Egypt and Persia (Iran), who were conquered by Arabs and never saw their glory days again, stand side by side with Western nations to send Islam back to Mecca?
Will the world finally unite against Islamic terror for the sake of our children and the millions of men and women who lost their lives to bring freedom to our world to end Islam’s desperate need for expansion?
Like a Ponzi scheme, Islam must expand to survive. In that sense, Islam works only when more people join its pyramid. As long as the supply of new Muslim believers can empower the pyramid and convince the other suckers, the naive Muslim followers, that they are right, it can survive.
The Ponzi scheme is currently still effective as it expands in the West without restrictions or conditions. (***) The expansion has given Islam a one-sided golden opportunity to grow in Europe, America, and Australia. Tragically, and to its ultimate demise, the West has extended a life line to a dying, evil ideology, one that has already predicted its own death. Now it will live a little longer, and because of that, it will continue to destroy others.
When will the West respect Mohammed’s prophecy, and send Islam back down the snake hole, the one in Mecca?
None Darwish
Reader: You will have noted that Mr Darwish expresses very strong anti-Islamic sentiments. We, of course, do not know the genesis of his serious opposition, but we suspect that he mirrors a growing number of once-loyal Muslims who have become disillusioned with that “faith” because of growing hatred of an increasingly “mad faction” within the Islamic ‘religion” towards all “infidel unbelievers” -– including their own.
We will comment on Mr Darwish’s contribution, for a number of scenarios that he hopes will help speed the end of Islam are simply unworkable in the current global political climate. Moreover, this whole Work has revealed the only outcome that is now inevitable for all religions.
(*) “[T]he Messenger of Allah (Mohammed) observed: Verily Islam started as something strange ...”
The reference to the religion in the beginning being “strange” is, in itself, a very strange statement.
The obvious question that comes to mind here is why would Mohammed, a Prophet called by God to unite a fractious, tribal, warring people to become one nation under one religion; then deem what he had received, strange? After all, it was given by the Archangel, Gabriel.
So whilst the religion itself might readily be described today as being “very strange”, the term cannot be placed at Mohammed’s feet, simply because the “religion” of Islam was ordained by God through Mohammed for the Arabian peoples; that they would unite and live more “spiritually-correctly” than was previously possible in their warring tribal configuration. The disparate groups under tribal chiefs necessarily had to accept a very different “set of rules” from what had previously been their way of life for a very long time.
However, as with every other Truth-Bringer and the religions that developed from their ordained missions, Muslims, also, were meant to have stayed with Mohammed’s teaching only until the arrival of The All-Truth centuries later. But they, too, did not recognise!
Perhaps the English term, strange; in this case was a simple error in translation. In attempting to describe the life and work of Mohammed, we would probably use the word, “unique”.
In any case, reader; shortly, from the Pages of Time, you will be exposed to the actual words of Mohammed. That will absolutely clarify certain, ostensibly sacrosanct, tenets that characterise the “religion of Islam” in the present, and which form the basis for the madness of Jihadist killings, bombings and self-sacrifice.
(**) “Islam is but a snake, a viper, behind the title of religion...”
Religion! In our view --- as it presents itself to the world today --- is a curse, a Pestilence, a blight upon mankind! Not because it should ever have been that, for through the line of the Truth-bringers for the different peoples of the world, what was thereby gifted to mankind was intended to bring benefit and knowledge, and thus incrementally-developing spiritual maturity. Yet, as we have hammered unceasingly throughout, not one people --- and especially their ensuing “religious leaders” --- was able to hold the teachings in their pure state. No: Non-understanding, wilful intransigence, ultimately leading to wilful distortion; --- exactly the state of “all religions” today!
(***) “...as it (Islam) expands in the West without restrictions or conditions”.
So-called “Human Rights” rears its non-understanding head here once again. As we have previously stated, ostensibly a seemingly-correct “notion” but, under the immutable umbrella of Creation-Law, one that only “takes” and then “takes again”. In this case, we are talking about mass movements of Muslim populations into non-Muslim societies --- wrought by war and the West’s blinkered-propensity for “regime change” and control of oil.
In the final analysis, it is the responsibility of any oppressed people to oppose tyranny in their own lands, and to fight for freedom in their own homeland. That is the correct way. For whole populations to simply decide to move ‘en-masse’ to another land and society --- and then demand their rights within that society or, worse; arrogantly demand that that society should alter their religion and culture to their religious and cultural demands --- is counter to all Higher Law! It also smacks of supreme arrogance!
It is thus incumbent on peoples “imposed upon” to ensure that their cultural values and perhaps “values of race” are not trampled upon or even subsumed to a radically different paradigm under the weakness of “human rights magnanimity”.
The large mass of Muslim immigrants fleeing from strife in their countries of race and culture, seriously threaten to alter the social order of European nations. Like them, European races possess their own cultural values developed over thousands of years. Misguided and/or weak politicians seriously transgress the Great Laws of life by allowing their values to be subsumed by a religious paradigm that occupies a far lower level than their own.
NOW GET THIS:
What we are bluntly saying here and now is simply an
encapsulation of this whole Work and its purpose. And that is: Because the
mass migration of fleeing immigrants today is primarily Muslim in origin;
demanding religious and cultural changes in their new European societies,
means the gradual and insidious “Islamisation” of those European nations.
That means that Europe has essentially accepted a dilution of the Truth
that was once their cornerstone and sure foundation. Even in its original,
once undistorted, form; Islam does not, and cannot, occupy a higher level
of Truth and Knowledge than that which Jesus, The Very Son of God,
brought to mankind.
Despite being only a shadow of its original pristine content, the
present “Christian ethos” at least still has as its basic foundation, the
acceptance of a clear Truth: That Jesus was and is The Son of God.
Mohammed could not be, and was not, any kind of “later replacement”.
Moreover, he knew this --- as you Muslims will shortly read.
More than any other race, nation and especially culture, the
Germanic peoples stand especially indicted, for to you came The Final
Truth of God! In the same way that The Son of God, Jesus, had to
incarnate into the Jewish race --- because they had been prepared over a
very long time and finally recognised The One God --- so too were the
German peoples prepared over many hundreds of years to receive ---
FIRST ---- The Grail Message of The Son of Man, Imanuel/Abd-ru-shin!
But we have stated all this in previous Discourses.
The weakness of European politicians --- especially German
politicians in this case --- is a tragedy of monumental “spiritual”
proportions for all of humankind --- but isn’t that the nature of politicians
anyway?
Reader: Throughout the Work we have quoted a number of what I would term “New Age Islamic scholars” who have given good reasons on why they have found the religion no longer tenable in both the teachings and the everyday practice of the religion --- not to mention the fractured state of it worldwide. Those aspects of Islam quite naturally produce the element of hypocrisy within it, and hypocrisy automatically accompanies “anything” that does not “practice what it preaches”!
For this Discourse on the demise of Islam, we offer one more contribution. It is an interview by Front Page Magazine of Abul Kasem, and reproduced online. He describes himself as an ex-Muslim, who is the author of hundreds of articles and several books on Islam including, ‘Women in Islam’. He was a contributor to the book ‘Leaving Islam --- Apostates Speak Out’ as well as to ‘Beyond Jihad: Critical Views From Inside Islam’.
What you have just read in italicised font, Kasem essentially endorses. Kasem also quotes and interprets various Koranic verses to flesh-out his view of Islam and associated Muslim opinion. Some verses we will comment on, and perhaps also look at M.M. Ali’s interpretation of them.
The following interview was conducted on Thursday, 17th July 2008, and updated on Wednesday, 6th August.
A RELEVANT INTERVIEW WITH FRONTPAGE
FP: Abul Kasem, welcome to Frontpage Interview.
FP: We’re here today to discuss the potential demise of Islam and the fact that
the Prophet Muhammad actually predicted this demise himself --- a fact that
sounds somewhat odd and that many are unaware of. What is the best way to
start a discussion on this issue?
Kasem: Well, I would start by asking this question: Could the current civilization
ever imagine a world without Islam?
To many, this might sound like a dim-witted question. After all, Islam has been
with us for fifteen hundred years. It just doesn’t even seem thinkable that Islam
could possibly die out. Currently, after all, Islam is the raging storm afflicting
every part of the world, especially with the mayhem of the Islamist terrorists and
the escalating oil prices --- and oil largely flows from a few Islamic lands. The
leaders of the un[non]-Islamic world are busy pleasing Islam in whatever manner.
Even the United Nation’s Human Rights Organisation has just passed a resolution
disallowing discussion of how Islam violates fundamental human rights in many
Islamic paradises. In this context, it seems impossible to imagine a world free of
Islam.
FP: Absolutely, and it is totally unrealistic to think that Islam will ever disappear.
Kasem: No. Despite the world situation that I just painted, what you say is not
true at all.
FP: Please explain.
Kasem: We learn from the annals of Islamic history that Islam is not that powerful
and that it is actually very vulnerable. Much evidence suggests that it may very
well die under its own weight.
FP: Fair enough, please expand.
Kasem: There is a secret life of Islam and it may very well lead to the death of
Islam. The history of Islam, for instance, tells us that Islam needs blood to thrive.
Human blood is the life-line of Islam, violence its hallmark, and hate its
foundation. In the beginning, Islam lives on the blood of infidels. When that is
unavailable, or becomes difficult, Islam must cannibalize itself. As a car needs
gasoline to run, so does Islam need human blood just to run its own course, set by
Muhammad, its Prophet. (*)
Reader: Because Kasem’s interview occupies many pages, we will comment on relevant points as we come to them. Now, whilst Kasem clearly understands the underlying nature of Islam, what we cannot do is permit any denigration of Mohammed for every sin and aspiritual deed that Islam has committed --- either against its own, or against its perceived enemies.
As we stated to you in PART I; what we have access to that Kasem and the Islamic world do not, is a series of writings about the lives and missions of the primary Truth-bringers of humankind. Mohammed naturally features in that Series as one of them; as one of God’s chosen and especial Teachers for the various groupings of humankind. So you will learn what he really said in that Discourse.
(*) Now; with this first asterisked point, we will simply say that Mohammed did not set the course for Islam’s later “rabid lust for infidel blood”. In the case of all the great Truth-bringers of history; none of them ever set any course of “strife and dissension” against others of “different faiths”. For they truly were “men of God”; unlike their adherents and followers, who could not hope to emulate them in either knowledge or spiritual deed. Here is the human reality and human stupidity:
“The Light gives the Truth to men, and men then convert it to just a religion.”
Now: Back to our interview:
FP: Sounds very much like communism. It starts off extinguishing the “class
enemy” and then when there are no more externals “enemies” to slaughter, the
killing machine turns on itself. Terror takes on a life of its own and the killing
machine devours its own children and then ultimately engages in suicide. This
totalitarian impulse stems from a death wish.
Kasem: Precisely. And so the demise of Islam is inherent in the very seed of
Islamic cannibalism. And so to understand why Islam, eventually, will self-destruct
we must first learn a few lessons from the annals of Islamic history. Let me briefly
paint the picture:
During the last few decades we have witnessed Islamic cannibalism right, front
and center. The most recent event was the Iran-Iraq war, in which millions of
Muslims were killed, not by the infidels (kafirs) but by Muslims. Undoubtedly, in
the not-too-distant future, we are bound to witness many such events of Islamic
cannibalism.
FP: Is Islamic cannibalism theologically rooted?
Kasem: Absolutely. The earliest example of Islamic cannibalism, after all, is found
in the Qur’an itself --- in verse 9:108-110. These verses refer to the gutting of a
rival mosque on the instruction of Muhammad, when he was returning after his
expedition to Tabuk, a resourceful town in the Syrian-Byzantine territory. This
Islamic incursion story goes like this:
Proceeding further from Tabuk on his way to Median, Muhammad halted at Dhu
Awan at Quba (about 4 kms. from Medina), an hour’s journey from Medina. There,
an opposition Muslim group had built a mosque. Previously, while Muhammad was
making preparations for the march to Tabuk, this group of Muslims approached
him and said, ‘O Messenger of God, we have built a mosque for the sick and the
needy and for rainy and cold nights, and we would like you to visit us and pray for
us” (The history of Tabari, vol ix, p. 61). Busy with his preparations for Tabuk
expedition, Muhammad excused himself from visiting this newly built mosque, but
assured the dissident group that he would call on their mosque while returning to
Medina (from Tabuk).
On his return journey from Tabuk and halting at Dhu Awan, Muhammad
accused builders of the mosque of being unjust. Without any warning he sent a
band of jihadists to burn and destroy the freshly constructed mosque. He said to
his band of hooligans, “Go to this mosque whose owners are unjust people and
destroy and burn it” (ibid, p. 61). His band of raging arsonists stealthily entered
the bustling mosque and set fire to it when it was filled with people for the
evening prayer. The worshippers dispersed in utter terror. Allah promptly sent
down verse 9:107, 110, justifying the destruction of opposition mosques. To
further validate his gutting of this mosque, Muhammad concocted the story that
he suspected that the builders of the “Mosque of Dissent” were planning to
assassinate him.
FP: So what is this story in the Qur’an teaching?
Kasem: Those verses in the Qu’ran, when taken in true Islamic spirit, can only
mean one thing: the call for the devastation of rival mosques. The most important
question is: which mosques are genuinely Islamic and which mosques are not so
Islamic? It is, therefore, a free-market in Islam when it comes to destruction and
bloodshed.
FP: The consequences?
Kasem: The consequences are obvious and inevitable: Sunnis are free to destroy
Shia mosques; the Shias are permitted to destroy Sunni mosques; both these
groups are free to destroy Ahmedi or Kurdish mosques, and so on. Within each
group there are sub-groups, and they are also entitled to commit such atrocities
on other groups. This is exactly what is going on in almost all Islamic paradises.
In Iraq, Sunnis are destroying Shia mosques and murdering them. In
Pakistan, Sunnis are killing the Shias and burning their mosques. Then the Shias
are avenging this by destroying Sunni mosques. In Bangladesh, both the Sunnis
and the Shias are occupying Ahmedi mosques and setting them on fire. This
musical chair of mosque-burning and killing is proceeding unabated, each group
claiming they are the true Muslims. Each group is adamant they are absolutely
following the Qu’ran and Sunna (Muhammad’s deeds and examples), the two
principles of Islam.
Interestingly, this fratricide is unstoppable, as the Islamic Ummah is far
from monolithic. No one knows the precise divisions among the Ummah. But
Muhammad has predicted that the Muslims will be divided into seventy-two sects,
each one killing one another, and together killing the infidels.
FP: So Muhammad actually himself predicted this cannibalism with Islam itself?
Give us the theological evidence.
Kasem: Yes he did. There are many hadith that discuss Muhammad’s prediction
about this Ummah. Let me give a few:
Seventy-two of the seventy-three Muslim sects will go to hell; only one of the
sects will be in Paradise; it is the majority group ... (Sunaan Abu Dawud,
3.40.4580) (**)
Islam has seventy branches ... ... (Sunaan Abu Dawud, 3.40.4659)
Whoever creates disunity in the Islamic community kill him ... (Sunaan Abu
Dawud, 3.40.4744)
In a note (footnote 4153), the English translator of Sunaan Abu Dawud, Professor
Ahmad Hasan admits that it is permissible to ‘cannibalize’ dissident Islamic group/
s. He writes: “The Prophet (may peace be upon him) did not tolerate disunity and
schism among Muslims. Therefore, he ordered that, instead of causing separation
and disagreement in the community, it is better to kill the person who causes
disunity.”
Another hadis (Sunaan Abu Dawud, 3.40.4747) asks to murder those Muslims who
are insecure in their faith. This hadis even tells that Allah loves the Muslims who
kill those insincere Muslims.
(**) Reader: Something else for you to shortly discover in Mohammed’s
words will be the terrible distortion that Islam has applied to paradise. What do
Muslims think; that killers and murderers will be permitted to grace a level of
Creation that is unadulterated and Pure, in a way that humans cannot even
begin to understand? Take the words from Matthew 7:14. “But small is the gate
and narrow the road that leads to life, and few there are that find it.”
Not the many of Islam, or Christianity, or Judaism, or many others for that
matter!
FP: Tell us a few major sects and sub-sects of Islam.
Kasem: Here are some of the main ones:
Sunnis: Hanafi, Maliki, Hanbal
Shia: Jaffril Lamilia Zaidiah Yazdis Sufis Wahabis Salafists Submitters (Qur’an only
Muslims)
Khilafites Deobandis Ashariyahs Alawis Qadianis Ahmedis Druzes Dawoodis
Bohras Kharizis Kurds
Needless to say, each group (and sub-group) think they are the true
Muslims, and only they have the right to practice Islam. Thus often, they
cannibalize one another. There is no tolerance, compromise or truce among these
groups.
FP: Tell us a few more cases of Islamic cannibalism that were perpetrated during
the nascent stages of Islam.
Kasem: Well, I mentioned the very first Islamic cannibalism mentioned in the
Qur’an. Ever since then, the practice of killing Muslims by Muslims is truly
endemic. During the time of Khulafa Rashedin (the rightly guided caliphs) this
cannibalism took a serious turn, sparing not even the last two caliphs, ‘Uthman
and Ali. Both of them were murdered by savage Islamic cannibals. Among the two
cases of Islamic cannibalism, perhaps the murder of ‘Uthman stands out to be the
most aghast. Here is how it was carried out, as described by Tabari (The History of
al Tabari, volume xv, pp 219 220):
...Muhammad b. Abi Bakr, accompanied by Kinanah b. Bishr b. ‘Attab, Sudan b.
Humran and ‘Amr b. al-Hamiq, reached ‘Uthman by climbing over the wall by the
house of ‘Amr b. Hazm. They found ‘Uthman, with his wife Na’ilah, reading the
Surah of the Cow from the Qur’an. Muhammad b. Abi Bakr came up to them and
seized ‘Uthman’s beard. “May God disgrace you, you hyena,” he said.
‘Uthman replied, “I am no hyena. I am God’s servant and the Commander of the
Faithful.” Muhammad said, “Neither Mua ‘wiyah nor anyone else has been of use
to you.”
‘Uthman said, “Son of my brother, let go my beard. Your father would not have
gripped like this.”
Muhammad replied, “Had my father seen you doing these things, he would have
denounced you for them, and I mean to do worse for you than grab your beard.”
‘Uthman said, “I seek God’s help and support against you.”
Then Muhammad pierced his forehead with a broad, iron-tipped arrow that he was
holding.
Kinanah b. Bishr raised some arrows of the same kind that he was holding and
plunged them into the base of ‘Uthman’s ear down to his throat. Then he fell on
him with his sword until he killed him.
According to ’Abd al-Rahman --- Abu ‘Awn:
Kinanah b. Bishr struck his forehead with an iron bar. He pitched forward, face
down, and Sudan b. Humran al-Muradi beat him after he had fallen and killed
him.... As to ‘Amr b. al-Hamiq, he jumped on ‘Uthman and sat on his chest --- he
was still barely alive --- and stabbed him nine times. ‘Amr said, “I stabbed him
three times for God’s sake and six times because of the anger in my breast
against him.”
If we are troubled reading these passages, we must remember that all of
those who ‘cannibalized’ ‘Uthman were impeccable Muslims --- the most ardent
Jihadists, belonging to the stock of Muhammad the Hashim clan of the Quraysh.
The Islamic cannibalism did not end there. The cycle continued until Aisha
(Prophet Muhammad’s dearest wife), along with two of her brothers-in-law, Talhah
and Zubayr set out to avenge ‘Uthman’s murder. When she reached al-Basrah, a
rebel stronghold, she killed (by beheading) six hundred of the suspected rebels
who had ‘cannibalized’ ‘Uthman. Ali, being sucked into the vortex of this
cannibalistic cycle, set out to punish Aisha’s gang.
The result: ten thousand Muslims, including Talhah and Zubayr lay
perished in al-Basrah, equal in proportion from both sides. Aisha’s life was spared
by the cannibals, but her camel was hamstrung.
In Islamic history this is known as the Battle of the Camel. This is perhaps
one of the most moving examples of how Islamic cannibalism really perpetuates a
never-ending cycle of violence and mayhem. This is the reason why we shall
never observe a let up to the succession of Islamic cannibalism in Iraq,
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Egypt or Sudan.
The narration of this very important chain of cannibalism will remain incomplete
till we learn the fate of all the participants sucked into this whirlpool of
cannibalism and counter cannibalism.
The following passages, adopted from Tabari’s Tarikh al-Tabari (vol. xvii)
illustrate very briefly how this cycle of Islamic cannibalism continued, and will
continue:
Muawiyah b. Abi Sufyan, the Governor of Syria and a close relative of
caliph ‘Uthman demanded from Ali the handing over of the killers of ‘Uthman.
When Ali refused to comply with this request, Muawiyah b. Abi Sufyan, and his
right-hand man, ‘Amr b. al-‘As (the deposed Governor of Egypt), became open
enemies of Ali. They gathered forces and set out to attack Ali. Ali met this force at
Siffin. Fearful of defeat at the hands of Ali’s fierce and well-trained army, (***)
Muwayiah and ‘Amr devised quite an innovative trick. Their soldiers attached
copies of the Qur’an at the tip of their lances and raised them high in [the] air.
Ali’s soldiers went in [into a] stupor and were hesitant to charge their enemy, lest
they trample the Holy Qur’an. Both sides remained [at a] standstill --- the battle
became a stalemate. In the end, both parties agreed to stop fighting and decided
on a speedy negotiated settlement by appointing an arbiter from each side.
Having mutually reached this agreement, both sides separated and returned.
But not everyone on Ali’s side was happy with his prompt decision. A
faction of Islamist extremists thought judgement belonged to Allah and Ali’s
decision to appoint arbiters for a peaceful settlement is contrary to Islamic
principle. This dissident group of Ali was known as the Kharijites. They insisted
that Ali resume fighting. But Ali could not renege on his treaty of a peaceful
settlement. The Kharijites declared Ali to be a sinner and asked him to repent.
Initial attempt by Ali for reconciliation with the Kharijites met with feeble success.
So, ultimately, Ali had to cannibalize the cannibals. He had to fight a major battle
at the canal of Nahrawan, east of river Tigris in Iraq. This battle ended with a
merciless mass slaughter of the Kharijites. But this cannibalization did not
completely eradicate the Kharijite problem. Many Kharijites survived this
genocide, went into hiding, and some of them returned to Kufa (Ali’s
headquarter[s]) in Iraq) stealthily. A few of them went to Egypt.
(***) “Ali’s fierce and well-trained army...” Reader; this particular observation of Muwayiah and ‘Amr is of especial interest to us. We recently told you how and why Ali’s soldiers were so fierce. It emerged because of a “promise”, a particular method of “conditioning”, that Abu Bekr, Mohammed’s general, introduced into the new Islamic army. We will learn all the detail of that foolish direction later from Mohammed’s true story.
FP: Let’s get back to Muhammad. He gave the instructions for --- and paved the
foundation to --- Islamic cannibalism. He also, in this context, made a prediction in
regard to Islam’s demise, correct?
Kasem: Yes, he predicted the demise of Islam.
As strange as it might appear in these days of unremitting Islamic
terrorism and Islamic cannibalism, Muhammad himself had predicted the decline
of Islam. Comparing Islam with a snake, he likened Islam to be confined between
the mosques of Mecca and Medina. Please read these hadith from Sahih Bukhari
and Sahih Muslim:
Belief returns and goes back to Median like a snake... (Sahih Bukhari, 3.30.100)
There will be no trace in some believers... (Sahih Bukhari, 9.84.65)
Islam was initiated as something strange, and it would revert to its (old position)
of being strange, and it would concentrate between the two mosques Justas the
serpent crawls back into its hole... (Sahih Muslim 1.0270)
The Islamic faith will recede to Medina just as the serpent crawls into its hole...
(Sahih Muslim 1.0271. 0272)
Allah needs sinners... (Sahih Muslim 37.6620.6622)
Muslims will diminish in number and they will go back to where they started...
(Sunaan Abu Dawud, 2.19.3029.)
Muslims will be the scum and the rubbish even though their numbers may
increase; the enemy will not fear Muslims anymore. This will be because the
Muslims will love the world and dislike death... (Sunaan Abu Dawud, 37.4284.)
Muhammad’s contemporaries were the best Muslims; after three generations, the
Muslims will be mainly treacherous and untrustworthy... (Sahih Bukhari, 5. 57. 2, 3)
Muslims will be destroyed through the hands of some Quraysh young men...
(Sahih Bukhari, 9.87. 180)
There will be much killing during the last days of the Muslims... (Sahih Bukhari,
9.88.183)
And here are a few excerpts from the greatest of all Islamic minds, al Ghazali:
Muhammad said Islam will begin with a few and will soon return to a few as it
began. The few of those true Muslims are those who follow to purify Muhammad’s
sunnah and follow strictly his traditions... (Ihya Ulum al Din by Ghazali, Tr, Fazl-ul-
Karim. First Edition. Darul Ishat, Urdu Bazar, Karachi, Pakistan, 1933. P. 1.49).
Muhammad said, “The wealth of a Muslim in near future will be goats and sheep.
He will roam in caves of hillocks and places of water. He will shift from one place
to another with his religion and calamities.” ... (ibid, p.2. 142)
Muhammad said, “In near future such a time will come upon man when it will be
difficult to save his religion. To save religion he will flee away like a [jackal] from
one cave to another and from one hillock to another.”... (ibid)
FP: H
Kasem: It is impossible to understand Allah’s mind. (****) In many verses He
threatens infidels with severe punishment, including death if they do not convert
to Islam. However, the Qur’an also demonstrates Allah’s frustration. Allah is so
disappointed with Muhammad’s performance that he promises to send a beast as
a final messenger (27:82). In verse 68:51 Allah admits that the Qur’an had made
Muhammad a mad man, thus implying that Muhammad, after all, could not be
trusted to save Islam. To accentuate Muhammad’s mental instability Allah says in
verse 41:36 that Allah let Satan confuse Muhammad. In verses 38:82 83 Allah
admits that He let loose Iblis, the Satan; He did not want to control Iblis. This
means that Satan is more powerful than Allah. Thus, it is imperative that
eventually, Satan will triumph and destroy Islam. This, of course, is the desire of
Allah, as nothing may transpire without Allah’s wish. Allah even admits that He
loves to sow discord about His Book (the Qur’an, 41:45).
(****) Firstly; reader, we would certainly agree with Kasem that: “It is impossible to understand Allah’s mind.”
Yet, despite that reality, the Koran in a number of verses proceeds to presume to know, or decides that it can speak for, The Creator --- and thereby “know the mind of Allah”. Let us see what M.M. Ali has to say about the verses Kasem points out.
Verse 27:82. “And when the word comes to pass against them, We shall bring forth a creature from the earth that will speak to them, because people did not believe in Our messages.a”
82a. ‘By the creature from the earth that will speak to them are evidently meant people who are bent low upon earth. These people are the materialistic nations of the West who have lost all sense of the higher values of life. The coming forth of the da’bbat al-ard is one of the signs of the approach of the Hour according to the Hadith. But the Hour may mean either the day of Judgement or the doom of a people, and this verse gives us an indication that the hour in this case stands for the doom of a nation; because here it is spoken of as being a punishment for not believing in the Divine messages.’
‘...not believing in the Divine messages...’ Yes: M.M. Ali; that is the real and final choice for all human beings. The problem is, understand what Divine Messages really are, and thus Who It was that brought them. Well, now that we are close to the end of this Work, if you have not grasped it by now, you probably never will!
Verse 68:51: ‘And those who disbelieve would almost smite thee with their eyes when they hear the Reminder, and they say: Surely he is mad!a’
M.M. Ali’s opinion of what the verse means is not the same as Kasem’s.
51a. ‘The chapter ends with exactly the same allegation on the part of the disbelievers as the one with which it opened. And the last verse, and it is naught but a Reminder for the nations, thus sums up the arguments advanced against that allegation. In fact, the arguments advanced in this chapter are equally true in all ages and for all nations. Note that even as early as the revelation of this chapter, the Prophet’s message is declared to be meant for all nations.’
Verse 41:36. ‘And if a false imputation from the devil afflict thee, seek refuge in Allah. a Surely He is the Hearing, the Knowing.’
36a. The previous verse teaches the repelling of evil with good. This verse suggests another remedy for evil. ...... The Prophet here is told that, if his work is interfered with by evildoers or if false imputations are made against him, he should seek refuge in Allah, and Divine help, which always comes to the righteousness, will make truth triumphant.’
Let us return to our Frontpage interview!
Kasem: ‘In verses 38:82 83 Allah admits that He let loose Iblis, the Satan; He did
not want to control Iblis. This means that Satan is more powerful than Allah. Thus,
it is imperative that eventually, Satan will triumph and destroy Islam.’
Verse 38:82 83 states ‘He said: Then, by Thy Might! I will surely lead them all
astray. Except Thy servants from among them, the purified ones.’
Now, reader: Here we absolutely disagree with what Kasem believes or interprets about “Satan’s” power. You have already read about him --- Lucifer --- in the very first Discourse in PART III, who he was, how he got here, and what he has now become.
Imanuel, The Spirit of Truth and Son of Man has explained everything we need to know about him. Certainly, with the insidious influence that Lucifer can generate in the minds of us weak humans, his influence “will triumph and destroy Islam”, as will similarly happen with all other religions.
In this present “discussion”, we ask: Why would the declaration that “Satan is more powerful than Allah” emerge from out of one of the monotheistic religions? That must be one of the most foolish and spiritually dangerous ‘declarations’ ever, Kasem! For that is not just stupidly-unbelievable, but it means that all such believers of it ultimately reject what Islam rightly titles The Lord of All the Worlds!
Kasem: ‘Allah even admits that He loves to sow discord about His Book (the
Qur’an, 41:45)’.
Another interesting opinion from Kasem; one that presumes to “know the mind of
Allah”. So, what does the verse say?
Verse 41:45. ‘And indeed We gave Moses the Book, but differences arose therein.
And had not a word already gone forth from thy Lord, judgement would have
been given between them. And surely they are in disquieting doubt about it.’
Two very different outlooks on Koranic verses. One, Kasem, who notes the reality of the Islamic mindset; and M.M. Ali, always the faithful supporter of Islam and all things Muslim, even if they are clearly illogical and unworkable as we have demonstrated many times over. Yet, despite his unwavering support for Islam, his belief in Allah is clearly imbued with great devotion. And then there are my explanations.
Reader, in order to arrive at the true picture, simply note the real-world situation with Islam in the 21st century. Whilst the “Jihadist reality” has probably always been there, what you have with this Work is the clearest possible understanding of Why it is so! Let us now conclude the interview with Kasem.
FP: So what do we conclude from what you have demonstrated today?
Kasem: We can conclude that there is a certain ending to Islam and that those
who wish for it do not necessarily need to do anything. All that is needed is to let
it run its own course. It is bound to self-destruct, if we are to learn the lessons of
Islamic history. The un-[non]Islam world needs to protect itself with strict security
measures, never letting the various groups of Islam unite to kill the infidels. Once
the infidels learn the secret life of Islam, it is simply a matter to watch how Islam
implodes. Once the Islamic oil runs dry, once the world secures a reliable source
of energy to replace oil, once the infidels stand together, land once the infidels
become iron-resolute to contain Islam in their lands, Islam will die a natural death.
FP: Abul Kasem, thank you for joining Frontpage Interview.
Kasem: My pleasure Jamie.
Given the amazing number of diverse groups of so-called true Muslims, the content of the above interview will surely be disputed by the imam’s of those factions.
Bible quote: “Violence begets further violence.” That reality has fuelled wars and butchery for as long as we have stood upright on earth, and it won’t stop until the time of the necessary culling of the human race through the elemental force of natural catastrophes running its terrible course. In the meantime, however, on the normal everyday certainty of humans killing other humans, it will, of course, continue to be ‘business as usual’.
What we can once more take from the interview is what we have hammered throughout; that any and all opposition to true Divine Law and Divine Will simply cannot stand. In the same way that the “body” of the global Christian Church fractured and splintered over many hundreds of years, so has the same occurred with Islam! It did, also, with Judaism.
In the case of Christianity, without the protests of Luther and the later break with Rome by Henry VIII, the narrow, restrictive knowledge-quotient that developed within, and finally characterised, Catholicism, would never have been opened up to more enlightening thought had those events not occurred. Despite believing that it is somehow “descended” from “Peter the Rock”, Catholicism is nothing more than dogma, and earthly power and empty ritual stemming from terrible distortions of Divine Truth!
The same can be said for Judaism. Sunnis and Shias to begin with for Islam at the very inception of the “religion”; Pharisees and Sadducees for the Jews, despite the One Law given by Moses, and the ongoing --- or perhaps almost never-ending --- admonitions to the Jewish race to “obey the Law” or suffer serious consequences.
The long development of some human societies has resulted in the separation of State from religion --- keeping them apart so that a beneficial societal balance might be struck. In the case of the new Jewish State, the “religion” of Judaism cannot really be separated from affairs of State, simply because there is far too much “stuff” invested in the very ethos and mindset of what it supposedly means “to be a Jew”. So even in the Knesset, political factions really equate to “religious factions”.
Still, despite that interesting reality, over and above all of the political disagreements, the question of “ownership of Jerusalem” and the Islamic factor, there nonetheless resides within the “collective soul of Judaism” the unshakeable belief that because they were the original “chosen people”, nothing can ever change that. Another group of poor, deluded fools --- as they will seriously experience.
Human beings in the first instance cannot denigrate, curse, alter or otherwise oppose any and all ordinances against the very Power of Creation --- that which gave us conscious life --- without one day incurring serious and unstoppable reciprocity. This writer has never understood, nor will ever even begin to understand, such really stupid arrogance. Who do we think we are?
As for They Who have come all the way down from Heights we cannot even begin to envision or comprehend, to bring to us the Divine Gift of Sublime Truth; They we cannot work against or harm without the most bitter, deserved and thus final outcome of a “spiritual-death” destiny!
For the Jewish race now, that is what is approaching you. But don’t worry, even though you so-stupidly murdered the Very One sent to you; JESUS --- for which full payment has yet to be exacted and which you will pay --- you are not alone.
Despite all the self-righteous commentary, defensive claptrap, protestations, declarations of final truth for all nations with the Koran, Islam will also pay a terrible price. For in declaring a human being to be greater than an actual PART of THE ONE GOD they profess to revere, worship, and even readily kill for; the whole of their Koran --- since the death of Mohammed altered and distorted in both form and format --- by Divine Creation-Law stands arraigned and indicted before DIVINE TRUTH!
In the final analysis, then; the Koran today is little more than a terrible denigration and inexcusable desecration of:
THE HOLY TRUTH OF GOD!